Table 1 Morphophysiological variables obtained for the varieties Amalia and Claudia in saline and non-saline conditions following the application of QuitoMax.

From: Mitigating salinity stress on tomato growth, water regime, gas exchange, and yield with the application of QuitoMax

Treatments

PH

RL

TS

LN

RV

Amalia

T1

27,56 ± 0,50 b

22,35 ± 0,61 b

8,25 ± 0,12 c

9,5 ± 0,11 c

12,80 ± 0,13 b

T2

30,01 ± 0,10 a

25,68 ± 0,45 a

10,92 ± 0,17 a

13,25 ± 0,12 a

14,49 ± 0,15 a

T3

28.90 ± 0.55 ab

25,55 ± 0,32 a

9,20 ± 0,18 b

12,38 ± 0,09 b

14,16 ± 0,13 a

SEx

0,031

0,034

0,025

0,035

0,018

CV

5,35

6,76

12,99

14,57

6,47

R2

0,55

0,90

0,85

0,92

0,70

Claudia

T1

26.69 ± 0.52 b

21.68 ± 0.45 c

7.28 ± 0.12 c

8.99 ± 0.17 c

12.56 ± 0.15 c

T2

32.76 ± 0.11 a

25.65 ± 0.25 a

10.52 ± 0.13 a

13.88 ± 0.14 a

14.79 ± 0.17 a

T3

31.71 ± 0.58 a

24.55 ± 0.23 b

8.89 ± 0.13 b

12.63 ± 0.15 b

13.48 ± 0.21 b

SEx

0.05

0.03

0.03

0,04

0.02

CV

8.84

7.47

16.27

18,47

7.29

R2

0.94

0.91

0.87

0,94

0.88

  1. Means with equal superscripts do not differ significantly according to Tukey’s HSD test at p < 0.01. Sample size n = 15.
  2. T1 saline soil without QuitoMax, T2 nonsaline soil + QuitoMax, T3 saline soil + QuitoMax, R2 unadjusted coefficient of determination, ES standard error of the mean of treatments, CV coefficient of variation, PH plant height, RL root length, SS stem thickness, LN number of leaves, RV root volume.
Back to article page