Table 11 Comparison of MRE and SDR for another automated cephalometric analysis system.

From: Accuracy of cephalometric landmark and cephalometric analysis from lateral facial photograph by using CNN-based algorithm

Method

Number of landmark

Number of total data

 

MRE (mm)

SDR(%)

2.0 mm

2.5 mm

3.0 mm

4.0 mm

Arik et.al.2

15

400

 

–

72.30

78.21

82.24

86.81

Gilmour et.al.32

15

 

1.14

83.81

89.14

93.22

97.13

Li et.al.33

15

 

1.20

83.72

89.34

92.72

96.78

Kwon et.al.34

15

 

1.24

83.01

88.78

92.21

96.59

Oh et.al.35

15

 

1.29

82.08

88.06

92.34

96.92

Kim et al. 10

15

860

1.03

87.13

91.19

93.52

96.59

Kim et al.9

23

2075

1.37

82.92

88.71

92.79

96.29

Takahashi et al.25

23

2000

0.61

98.20

99.55

99.79

99.93

Present study

23

2400

CL II

0.42

100

100

100

100

23

CL III

0.46

99.96

100

100

100

Back to article page