Table 9 Comparison of the different cases.
From: The integration of optimizing train timetables with EMU route plans
Case | Number of EMUs used | Number of maintenance tasks | Total travel time (min) | Average travel speed (km/h) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Case 0 | 171 | 138 | 115,516 | 180.5 |
Case 1 | 169 | 132 | 115,218 | 180.9 |
Case 2 | 169 | 126 | 114,987 | 181.3 |
Case 3 | 167 | 121 | 114,748 | 181.7 |
Case 4 | 167 | 120 | 114,588 | 181.9 |
Case 5 | 167 | 118 | 114,505 | 182.1 |
