Table 5 Comparative analysis of the MFFDCNN-CTDC model on the HAM10000 dataset42,43.
HAM10000 Dataset | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Methods | Accuracy | Sensitivity | Specificity | F-score |
MFFDCNN-CTDC | 99.02 | 87.86 | 99.12 | 89.47 |
AMCSCC-WHOEL | 98.54 | 78.41 | 98.70 | 81.60 |
Ensemble CNN+SVM | 96.52 | 76.22 | 78.66 | 76.39 |
MAFCNN-SCD | 92.25 | 77.10 | 88.71 | 80.08 |
NB Methodology | 89.80 | 74.73 | 84.05 | 81.10 |
Kernel-ELM | 88.07 | 77.05 | 84.52 | 80.23 |
MSVM Method | 87.18 | 75.48 | 83.23 | 80.48 |
MobileNet Model | 85.06 | 74.20 | 88.01 | 80.20 |
DenseNet169 Model | 89.45 | 76.86 | 86.31 | 81.05 |