Table 4 Correlations between alpha peak frequency and values of Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS), before and after treatment and the change in those scores (SHAPS_Post minus SHAPS_Pre). Note: Significant p-values are in bold.
From: Effect of DLPFC rTMS on anhedonia and alpha asymmetry in depressed patients
Group | SHAPS_Pre | SHAPS_Post | Change in SHAPS | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bilateral | Alpha peak_Pre | Pearson Correlation | 0.084 | 0.461* | 0.222 |
Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.690 | 0.020 | 0.287 | ||
N | 25 | 25 | 25 | ||
Alpha peak_Post | Pearson Correlation | − 0.043 | 0.228 | 0.196 | |
Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.839 | 0.274 | 0.348 | ||
N | 25 | 25 | 25 | ||
Sham | Alpha peak_Pre | Pearson Correlation | 0.868** | 0.458 | − 0.536 |
Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.002 | 0.215 | 0.137 | ||
N | 9 | 9 | 9 | ||
Alpha peak_Post | Pearson Correlation | 0.136 | 0.318 | 0.301 | |
Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.726 | 0.404 | 0.431 | ||
N | 9 | 9 | 9 | ||
Unilateral | Alpha peak_Pre | Pearson Correlation | − 0.195 | − 0.086 | 0.191 |
Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.361 | 0.689 | 0.370 | ||
N | 24 | 24 | 24 | ||
Alpha peak_Post | Pearson Correlation | − 0.148 | − 0.222 | 0.074 | |
Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.491 | 0.297 | 0.730 | ||
N | 24 | 24 | 24 | ||
