Table 5 Regression fits to Kamlet–Abboud–Taft solvatochromic parameters for absorbance, fluorescence and Stokes’ shift for Azo form of dyes in organic solvents.

From: Solvent polarity effect on photophysical properties of some aromatic azo dyes with focus on tautomeric and toxicity competition

Dyes

\((\tilde{v}_{{}} )_{0} (10^{3} cm^{ - 1} )\)

\(a\,\left( {10^{3} cm^{ - 1} } \right)\)

\(b\;\left( {10^{3} cm^{ - 1} } \right)\)

\(s\,\left( {10^{3} cm^{ - 1} } \right)\)

R2

Ponceau 4R

 Absorbance

24.132 (± 1.408)

 − 1.164 (± 0.254)

 − 3.371 (± 1.168)

 − 1.278 (± 0.626)

0.91

 Fluorescence

22.063 (± 2.121)

 − 1.397 (± 0.303)

 − 4.127(± 1.690)

 − 1.142 (± 0.965)

0.96

 Stokes’ shift

5.069 (± 1.465)

0.536 (± 0.446)

 − 2.563 (± 1.301)

 − 1.028 (± 0.812)

0.86

Sunset yellow FCF

 Absorbance

22.607 (± 1.315)

 − 0.474(± 1.251)

 − 1.835(± 1.780)

 − 0.618 (± 1.761)

0.94

 Fluorescence

29.099 (± 4.092)

 − 5.032 (± 1.918)

 − 7.769 (± 2.653)

 − 1.729 (± 0.832)

0.83

 Stokes’ shift

5.107 (± 0.129)

 − 0.446 (± 0.124)

 − 1.869 (± 0.140)

 − 1.280(± 0.150)

0.99

Tartrazine

 Absorbance

32.268 (± 3.689)

 − 1.426 (± 0.793)

 − 6.806 (± 2.866)

 − 4.741 (± 1.806)

0.82

 Fluorescence

20.094 (± 0.206)

 − 0.468 (± 0.135)

 − 1.029 (± 0.210)

 − 0.310 (± 0.196)

0.96

 Stokes’ shift

9.172 (± 2.071)

 − 0.513 (± 0.384)

 − 3.702 (± 1.794)

 − 2.566 (± 0.861)

0.82