Table 8 Regression fits to Kamlet–Abboud–Taft solvatochromic parameters for absorbance, fluorescence and Stokes’ shift for Hydrazone form of dyes in LCs.

From: Solvent polarity effect on photophysical properties of some aromatic azo dyes with focus on tautomeric and toxicity competition

Dyes

\((\tilde{v}_{{}} )_{0} (10^{3} cm^{ - 1} )\)

\(a\,\left( {10^{3} cm^{ - 1} } \right)\)

\(b\;\left( {10^{3} cm^{ - 1} } \right)\)

\(s\,\left( {10^{3} cm^{ - 1} } \right)\)

R2

Ponceau 4R

 Absorbance

15.341 (± 4.384)

0.439 (± 0.338)

12.413 (± 1.774)

 − 7.024(± 0.959)

0.86

 Fluorescence

12.420 (± 5.206)

 − 0.300 (± 0.737)

5.659 (± 1.973)

 − 3.853 (± 1.042)

0.94

 Stokes’ shift

4.048 (± 0.454)

1.319(± 0.351)

34.138(± 1.841)

 − 17.821(± 9.948)

0.94

Sunset yellow FCF

 Absorbance

9.636 (± 8.246)

0.657(± 0.961)

32.904(± 3.525)

 − 16.335(± 1.986)

0.80

 Fluorescence

7.565 (± 5.207)

 − 1.866 (± 0.631)

30.071(± 2.076)

 − 18.120 (± 1.115)

0.97

 Stokes’ shift

0.532 (± 0.539)

2.558 (± 2.149)

10.495(± 8.716)

 − 3.024(± 1.154)

0.98

Tartrazine

 Absorbance

34.340 (± 7.116)

 − 1.095 (± 1.008)

 − 53.360 (± 26.970)

28.576(± 14.254)

0.86

 Fluorescence

16.802 (± 4.177)

 − 1.011 (± 0.461)

 − 14.950 (± 12.350)

7.572(± 6.528)

0.89

 Stokes’ shift

17.537 (± 1.037)

 − 0.083 (± 0.147)

 − 38.409 (± 3.930)

21.004 (± 2.078)

0.82