Table 1 Summary of the studied works.
From: User preference modeling for movie recommendations based on deep learning
References | Year | Research goal | Method | Limitation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Ahuja et al.24 | 2019 | Develop movie recommender system | K-Means Clustering, K-Nearest Neighbor | Relies on basic clustering and similarity-based methods, potentially limiting recommendation accuracy. |
Katarya and Verma25 | 2017 | Improve movie recommendation system | Cuckoo search optimization, K-Means Clustering | Optimization-based approach might be sensitive to parameter tuning, and relies on clustering for user grouping. |
Thakker et al.26 | 2021 | Analyze CF algorithm for movie recommendation | User-based and item-based CF, Machine learning algorithms | Focuses on CF algorithms, not proposing a new method, and lacks exploration of deep learning techniques. |
Gupta et al.27 | 2020 | Enhance movie recommendation accuracy | K-NN algorithms, Collaborative filtering | Relies on traditional similarity-based methods, without incorporating rich user behavior information. |
Airen and Agrawal28 | 2022 | Explore KNN variations for movie recommendation | KNN algorithms with different similarity measures | Limited to KNN variations, not addressing broader recommendation techniques or incorporating advanced machine learning. |
Chauhan et al.29 | 2021 | Improve movie recommendation with user sentiment | Combined CF, CB filtering, sentiment analysis | Does not consider deep learning or advanced machine learning techniques, and might face challenges in handling complex user preferences. |
Tahmasebi et al.30 | 2021 | Develop hybrid movie recommender system | Deep autoencoder network, CF, CB filtering, social influence | While incorporating social influence, it might not fully capture complex user-item interactions. |
Lee et al.31 | 2022 | Improve movie recommender system with sentiment and emotion | Network-based model with sentiment, emotion information | Relies on sentiment and emotion information, which might not fully capture diverse user preferences. |
Sun et al.32 | 2016 | Develop social-aware group recommendation | Group preference model, social-aware tolerance and altruism model | Focuses on group recommendation, not individual preferences, and might not generalize well to diverse group settings. |
Yadav et al.33 | 2021 | Develop movie recommender system with big data techniques | Big data clustering, PCA | While using big data techniques, the model might be complex and computationally expensive. |
Abderrahmane et al.34 | 2022 | Develop movie recommender system | KNN, Collaborative filtering | Relies on basic similarity-based methods, without incorporating rich user behavior information or advanced machine learning techniques. |
Ambikesh et al.35 | 2023 | Develop movie recommender system with Harris hawks optimization | Harris hawks optimization, K-means clustering | Optimization-based approach might be sensitive to parameter tuning, and clustering-based methods might not capture complex user preferences. |
Zubi et al.36 | 2022 | Develop efficient hybrid movie recommender system | Association rule mining, KNN classification | While using association rules, the model might not fully capture user preferences and might be limited to frequent itemsets. |
Jain and Essah37 | 2022 | Develop movie recommendation system for online streaming | Collaborative filtering (cosine similarity, KNN, SVD) | Relies on basic collaborative filtering techniques, without incorporating additional features or advanced machine learning. |
Sharma et al.38 | 2022 | Develop hybrid recommender system with sparrow clustering | Sparrow clustered recommender system | The effectiveness of the sparrow clustering algorithm for recommendation tasks is yet to be fully established. |
El Alaoui et al.39 | 2022 | Improve item recommendations using GNNs. | Deep GraphSAGE with Jumping Knowledge (JK) connections and Ordinal Aggregation Network (OAN). | Primarily item-based, may not generalize to diverse contextual data. |
El Alaoui et al.40 | 2021 | Compare matrix factorization (SVD) and deep MLPs for collaborative filtering. | Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) vs. Multilayer Perceptron (MLP). | Limited dataset and evaluation metrics, potential generalizability issues. |
Rendle et al.41 | 2020 | Compare neural collaborative filtering (NCF) and matrix factorization (MF). | Learned similarities (MLP) vs. Dot products. | Computational efficiency focus may limit applicability in other contexts. |
El Alaoui et al.42 | 2021 | Find the best recommendation approach for scientific articles. | Collaborative filtering, content-based, and hybrid methods. | Evaluation relies on classical IR metrics, may not fully capture user satisfaction. |
El Alaoui et al.43 | 2024 | Improve contextual recommendations. | Dynamic Graph Attention Network with Adaptive Edge Attributes (DGAT-AEA). | Model complexity may pose real-time application challenges. |
Ziaee et al.44 | 2024 | Enhance movie recommendation systems. | Heterogeneous GNN and GAE-based model (MoRGH). | Focus on RMSE may not capture other recommendation qualities. |
El Alaoui et al.45 | 2024 | Improve social recommendation systems. | Heterogeneous Graph Attention Networks. | Focus on social recommendations may limit broader applicability. |
El Alaoui et al.46 | 2024 | Compare filtering methods for scientific research article recommendations. | Collaborative filtering, content-based, and hybrid methods. | Findings may be specific to the scientific literature domain. |