Table 3 Comparative analysis of the CDMFL-AIDCNN method under the CIC-IDS-2017 dataset25,26, and27.
CIC-IDS-2017 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Methods | Accuracy | F1-Score | Recall | Precision |
MLP Algorithm | 88.88 | 88.75 | 86.38 | 88.56 |
BBB-BAE-Homo | 94.77 | 92.23 | 93.46 | 91.84 |
MCD-BAE-Hetero-Last | 93.62 | 91.96 | 91.67 | 91.49 |
LSTM Classifier | 91.02 | 91.09 | 89.96 | 92.56 |
1D-CNN Methodology | 95.43 | 92.57 | 90.28 | 93.26 |
Deep-GFL Model | 94.69 | 94.60 | 93.96 | 92.97 |
DBN Approach | 95.59 | 92.58 | 92.88 | 88.87 |
ENIDS-IV Model | 98.27 | 93.11 | 92.55 | 93.07 |
CDMFL-AIDCNN | 99.07 | 94.65 | 94.56 | 94.75 |