Table 1 Clinical and demographic data of all patients. Demographic data with ‘mean (standard deviation)’. BG = basal ganglia; Neg + = patients with Spatial neglect; Neg- = patients without Spatial neglect; coc = centre of cancellation (Rorden and Karnath, 2010).

From: Spatial neglect after subcortical stroke may reflect cortico-cortical disconnection

Patient Group

All

BG stroke, Neg+

BG stroke, Neg-

Thalamus stroke, Neg+

Thalamus stroke, Neg-

N

43

10

17

4

12

Age

64.0 (12.7)

66.5 (17.4)

60.4 (11.1)

72.0 (9.1)

64.3 (11.1)

Sex (F/M)

15/28

6/4

3/14

2/2

4/8

Aetiology

(ischemia/haemorrhage)

34/9

9/1

16/1

0/4

9/3

Lesion volume (ml)

4.70 (5.20)

9.46 (7.64)

4.06 (3.95)

4.09 (1.34)

1.84 (1.49)

Lesion to examination (days)

4.7 (4.8)

6.0 (6.1)

4.4 (4.4)

8.8 (6.2)

2.6 (2.1)

Lesion to imaging (days)

2.3 (4.1)

3.3 (4.6)

2.0 (2.4)

9.5 (13.4)

1.0 (1.8)

Neglect severity (CoC)

0.16 (0.27)

0.50 (0.31)

0.01 (0.02)

0.36 (0.22)

0.00 (0.01)

Hemiparesis (%)

77

88

64

100

78