Table 5 Optimization result of pressure vessel design compared with other methods.
Algorithm | Statistical results | Optimum variable | f (x1,x2,x3,x4) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best value | Worst value | Mean value | SD value | Rank | Ts | Th | R | L | ||
HGWPSO | 5.9864E+03 | 7.9068E+03 | 7.0940E+03 | 993.5137 | 1 | 1.2680 | 0.6227 | 64.8953 | 11.6436 | 73880.69240 |
HMFOPSO | 1.8084E+04 | 7.9770E+08 | 2.6593E+08 | 4.6053E+08 | 11 | 4.6893 | 1.1194 | 108.3815 | 10 | 74527.49710 |
HPSOALO | 1.6454E+04 | 3.3631E+04 | 2.7705E+04 | 7.7484E+03 | 8 | 2.6400 | 0.8120 | 65.2256 | 10 | 16454.04480 |
HGWOWOA | 7.8948E+03 | 1.1057E+04 | 9.6865E+03 | 1.6225E+03 | 5 | 1.0802 | 0.5461 | 52.3730 | 103.3057 | 78940.83850 |
HGWOSCA | 1.0577E+04 | 1.6015E+04 | 1.3662E+04 | 2.7771E+03 | 7 | 1.1171 | 0.9953 | 51.0125 | 119.4567 | 105760.95130 |
GWO | 1.0115E+05 | 1.0688E+05 | 1.0403E+05 | 2.8617E+03 | 13 | 6.1875 | 6.1875 | 65.7073 | 10 | 101152.8429 |
PSO | 3.4289E+04 | 8.7371E+04 | 6.0703E+04 | 2.6542E+04 | 12 | 2.29953 | 1.3102 | 75.6737 | 104.0264 | 342890.19320 |
MFO | 1.7667E+04 | 1.077E+05 | 5.7454E+04 | 4.6053E+08 | 10 | 5.0038 | 3.4700 | 77.8128 | 98.7630 | 107774.34880 |
WOA | 1.0276E+04 | 1.156E+04 | 1.3257E+04 | 2.9406E+03 | 6 | 1.3994 | 0.9046 | 57.2007 | 49.8198 | 10276.18410 |
SCA | 7.4672E+03 | 1.5170E+04 | 1.1005E+04 | 3.9277E+03 | 3 | 1.4531 | 0.7145 | 68.8923 | 22.6484 | 10479.00390 |
ALO | 7.8707E+03 | 9.7807E+03 | 8.7942E+03 | 956.5815 | 4 | 1.1998 | 0.5058 | 52.7850 | 87.7040 | 78700.65220 |
COA | 1.5200E+04 | 5.8623E+07 | 1.9552E+07 | 3.3836E+07 | 9 | 0.9264 | 3.9620 | 43.56829 | 161.3903 | 18607.67190 |
GJO | 6.2578E+03 | 7.7917E+03 | 6.9028E+03 | 795.5170 | 2 | 0.91011 | 0.5599 | 46.8555 | 126.9746 | 66580.81270 |