Table 6 Optimization result of string/compression spring design compared with other methods.
Algorithm | Statistical results | Optimum variable | f (x1,x2,x3) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best value | Worst value | Mean value | SD value | Rank | W | D | N | ||
HGWPSO | 0.0132 | 0.0138 | 0.0134 | 3.3074E-04 | 1 | 0.0592 | 0.5664 | 4.9299 | 0.013069 |
HMFOPSO | 1.6915E+09 | 1.7682E+09 | 1.7257E+09 | 3.9028E+07 | 13 | 1.7809 | 0.7952 | 8.5056 | 1.718e+09 |
HPSOALO | 9.3035E+08 | 9.3035E+08 | 9.3035E+08 | 0 | 11 | 0.05001 | 0.2500 | 2 | 9.303e+08 |
HGWOWOA | 0.0209 | 0.0264 | 0.0233 | 0.0028 | 5 | 0.0643 | 0.52914 | 10.0854 | 0.026408 |
HGWOSCA | 0.0145 | 0.0168 | 0.0157 | 0.0011 | 3 | 0.0666 | 0.8328 | 2.5335 | 0.016768 |
GWO | 0.0343 | 5.3568E+07 | 1.7856E+07 | 3.0928E+07 | 9 | 0.1173 | 1.0773 | 15 | 5.357e+07 |
PSO | 9.9971E+08 | 1.1786E+09 | 1.0594E+09 | 1.0324E+08 | 12 | 0.4189 | 0.3425 | 10.711 | 9.998e+08 |
MFO | 9.3175E+08 | 1.1156E+09 | 1.0157E+09 | 9.2934E+07 | 10 | 0.8394 | 0.8339 | 4.8842 | 1.116e+09 |
WOA | 0.0185 | 9.3035E+08 | 4.6932E+08 | 4.6523E+08 | 6 | 0.05000 | 0.2500 | 2 | 9.303e+08 |
SCA | 0.0234 | 0.0326 | 0.0294 | 0.052 | 7 | 0.0782 | 1.3001 | 2.0356 | 0.032058 |
ALO | 0.0168 | 0.0181 | 0.0175 | 6.8278E-04 | 4 | 0.06832 | 0.8722 | 2.4497 | 0.018109 |
COA | 8.1084E+08 | 8.4566E+08 | 8.2572E+08 | 1.7958E+07 | 8 | 0.05059 | 0.3282 | 2.3873 | 8.207e+08 |
GJO | 0.0134 | 0.0136 | 0.0135 | 1.1603E-04 | 2 | 0.05001 | 0.3147 | 15 | 0.013976 |