Table 8 Optimization result of gear train design compared with other methods.
Algorithm | Statistical results | Optimum variable | f (x1,x2,x3,x4) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best value | Worst value | Mean value | SD value | Rank | y1 | y2 | y3 | y4 | ||
HGWPSO | 1.0847E−10 | 0.73226 | 0.24409 | 0.42277 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 15 | 11.5525 | 1.0847e−10 |
HMFOPSO | 0.049028 | 8.2495 | 3.5085 | 4.2478 | 13 | 5.0789 | 8.2401 | 13.6159 | 8.40500 | 0.049028 |
HPSOALO | 0.035741 | 0.73226 | 0.50009 | 0.40213 | 9 | 14.5583 | 15 | 15 | 14.5583 | 0.73226 |
HGWOWOA | 2.6635E−06 | 4.7091E−05 | 2.0276E−05 | 2.36E−05 | 7 | 5 | 5.7210 | 14.2062 | 14.11567 | 2.6635e−06 |
HGWOSCA | 1.088E−06 | 5.1218E−06 | 2.8835E−06 | 2.0531E−06 | 4 | 5.1167 | 5.1513 | 13.1050 | 13.7247 | 5.1218e−06 |
GWO | 1.2187E−06 | 0.003919 | 0.0013073 | 0.0022619 | 6 | 5 | 6.5422 | 15 | 15 | 1.2187e−06 |
PSO | 0.026329 | 3.1529 | 1.2036 | 1.7002 | 10 | 14.4685 | 13.3570 | 12.45651 | 8.08086 | 3.1529 |
MFO | 0.14432 | 0.61196 | 0.30851 | 0.26309 | 11 | 6.25445 | 13.3518 | 14.6642 | 10.8641 | 0.14432 |
WOA | 0.035741 | 0.73226 | 0.50009 | 0.40213 | 9 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0.73226 |
SCA | 1.1618E−06 | 2.1518E−05 | 8.9877E−06 | 1.0963E−05 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 15 | 11.6386 | 1.1618e−06 |
ALO | 9.1606E−08 | 2.0076E−06 | 9.3967E−07 | 9.767E−07 | 3 | 5 | 6.4789 | 15 | 15 | 9.1606e−08 |
COA | 9.9406E−06 | 0.14285 | 0.048325 | 0.081858 | 12 | 5.0316 | 5 | 7.0761 | 6.8081 | 0.14285 |
GJO | 5.1967E−09 | 7.8778E−08 | 3.3584E−08 | 3.9565E−08 | 2 | 5.0757 | 5 | 12.4581 | 14.1066 | 1.6777e−08 |