Introduction

Akabane virus (AKAV) is arthropod-borne, negative-sense RNA virus with segmented structure. This virus belongs to the Simbu serogroup of the Orthobunyavirus genus, family Bunyaviridae, and is similar to Schmallenberg virus (SBV) that emerged in 2011 2,3,4. Although biting midges (Culicoides spp.) seem to be the main vectors, AKAV has been isolated from mosquitoes on multiple occasions5,6. Cattle, buffalo, sheep, goats, horses, deer, and pigs are among the many wild ruminants and animals that are infected with AKAV7,8.

Akabane disease (AD) primarily affects cattle and, in rare cases, sheep and goats. Adult cattle infected with AKAV show no specific symptoms after short transit fever9. But some AKAV strains can pass through the placenta of pregnant cows and cause several problems in the developing foetus, including abortion. These birth problems include stillbirths, premature births, and various brain abnormalities such microcephaly and porencephaly, depending on the stage of pregnancy2,10.

Akabane disease has caused significant economic losses in several countries. In addition, the main financial losses associated with AKAV infection in dairy cattle are infertility, preterm abortion, dystocia during delivery, and a marked decline in the milk yield of infected cows11,12.

The virus was firstly discovered in 1959 in Gumma Prefecture, Japan, in mosquitoes (Aedes vexans and Culex tritaeniorhynchus)9. It is commonly recognized that AKAV is widely distributed throughout East Asian in tropical and subtropical regions, Australia, the Middle East, and Africa13,14. AKAV has been detected in wild animals in Africa using virus isolation, molecular techniques, and serology15, as well as domestic animals in Tanzania16, Nigeria17, Kenya18, Sudan19 and Egypt20.

Various diagnostic approaches have been developed for diagnosing AD in different animal species. Serological approaches, including as viral neutralization tests, immunohistochemistry staining, ELISAs, and dot immunobinding assays are routinely used to diagnose AD21,22,23,24. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods, including real-time RT-PCR [31], multiplex RT-PCR25, nested reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR)26, and reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay (RT-LAMP)27, have been successfully used to identify the AKAV genome.

Although the disease has been reported within the country, there is presently no vaccination program or established insect management control in place to prevent its spread. This is particularly concerning given the frequent reporting of AD in neighboring countries and other countries from which Egypt imports animals.

Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the seroprevalence of AD in cattle in four Egyptian governorates, as well as to assess the associated risk factors for infection.

Materials and methods

Ethical statement

This study was authorized by the Benha University Faculty of Veterinary Medicine’s ethical committee. Furthermore, all procedures followed the guidelines and regulations of Benha University’s ethics council. Consent and permission from the owner were obtained for all animals involved in the study. The research followed ARRIVE criteria.

Study area

The study was conducted from March 2023 to February 2024 across four Egyptian governorates, namely Kafr Elsheikh, Menofia, Qalybia, and Alexandria (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Full size image

MAP showed locations of the studies governorates (MAP generated by QGIS software).

The three governorates (Kafr Elsheikh, Menofia and Qalybia) situated at Nile Delta of Egypt, which characterized by a semi-arid climate typical of the Nile Delta region. Summers are quite hot, with temperatures averaging 30 °C to 35 °C. Winters are cooler, with temperatures between 8 °C and 18 °C. Rainfall is sparse, mostly occurring during the winter months, and it is generally less than what is seen in the northern coastal regions. Alexandria has a classic Mediterranean climate with more rainfall compared to the other governorates, whereas summers are warm, with temperatures ranging from 25 °C to 30 °C, while winters are mild, with temperatures ranging from 10 °C to 18 °C. It receives significant rainfall, mostly during the winter months, with an average annual precipitation of around 200 mm to 400 mm.

Climatic changes, such as rising temperatures, increased rainfall, and humidity, significantly influence the spread of mosquitoes and the Akabane virus in the selected governorates. Without adequate vector control measures, such as mosquito management and vaccination programs, these regions are at a heightened risk of Akabane outbreaks, threatening livestock health and economic stability.

Sample size and sampling

The number of samples required to evaluate the seroprevalence of AD in cattle was calculated using the formula provided by Thrusfield28.

N = Z2Pexp(1-Pexp)/d2.

where n is the required number of samples, p is the expected prevalence, Z is the 95% confidence interval, and d is the absolute error 5%. The precision was improved by increasing the sample size from the calculated 384 to 540 samples. Blood sample (5mL) was collected from jugular vein of each examined cattle using vacutainer tube. The sera separated by centrifugation for ten min at 3000 rpm and kept at -20 C until serological analysis.

Serological analysis

The commercial ID Screen® Akabane Competition ELISA kit (ID.vet, Grabels, France) was used to identify specific Anti-G1 antibodies for AKAV in serum, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Furthermore, this kit had no cross-reaction with other viruses in Family Bunyaviridae such as Rift Valley fever virus, Schmallenberg virus and Aino virus. In addition, it has highest correlation the virus neutralization test as verified by Li, et al.21. The results were read at an optical density (OD) of 450 nm with a microplate absorbance spectrophotometer reader (ALLSheng A101; China).

The optical densities (ODs) of each test sample were used to calculate the sample (S) to negative (N) ratio (S/N%) using the below formula.

S/N (%) = OD sample/OD negative control X 100.

Samples with a S/N% greater than 40% were judged negative, while those between 30% and 40% were regarded dubious. Samples with a S/N% less than 30% were considered positive.

Questionnaire

An epidemiological questionnaire was prepared during sampling to collect data on all animals in order to assess the risk factors associated with AKAV infection in cattle. The factors studied and their related categories are as follows: locality (Kafr ElSheikh, Menofia, Qalyubia and Alexandria), age (< 2 years, 2–5 years, >5years), sex (male/female), breed (mixed or Holstein), herd size (< 50, 50–70 and > 70), season (summer, spring, autumn, and winter) and history of abortion (yes/no).

Statistical analysis

The data was collected and statistically analyzed using Microsoft Excel. Further statistical analysis was performed with SPSS version 24 (IBM, USA). Univariable logistic regression was employed to evaluate the association between each variable and the seroprevalence of AKAV infection in cattle. P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

A logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the relationship between AKAV antibodies and risk factors including locality, age, sex, breed, season, and history of abortion. Variables with a P-value less than 0.25 in the univariable analysis were included in a multivariate logistic regression model. The multivariate model was utilized to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) and confidence intervals (CIs) for each significant variable. The model’s fit was assessed using the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test.

Results

The total seroprevalence of AKAV antibodies in investigated cattle samples was 24.4% (132/450). The prevalence rates ranged from the highest 36.2% (47/130) in Alexandria to the lowest 15.6% (21/135) in Qalyubia governorate. The prevalence rate varied substantially between governorates (P = 0.001), Table 1.

Table 1 Seroprevalence of Akabane virus in cattle in four Egyptian governorates.

Moreover, the seroprevalence of AKAV antibodies was significantly higher in cattle older than five years 35% (77/220), and in females 26.4% (126/478). Holstien cattle revealed higher significant seroprevalence rate 29.5% (96/325) in comparison to mixed breed and the winter had the greatest seroprevalence of AKAV antibodies at 36.8% (67/182) when compared to other seasons. Furthermore, the animals with history of abortion revealed higher seroprevalence rate 32.9% than other animals, Table 1.

The results of multivariable logistic regression for different significant variables associated with AKAV infection in cattle revealed that Alexandria (OR = 2.9, 95%CI: 1.53–5.46, P = 0.001), age over 5 years (OR = 3.7, 95%CI: 1.65–8.48, P = 0.002), females (OR = 2.7, 95%CI: 1.08–6.96, P = 0.034), Holstein (OR = 2.1, 95%CI: 1.29–3.36, P = 0.003), winter (OR = 3.7, 95%CI: 1.84–7.51, P < 0.0001), and history of abortion (OR = 2.5, 95%CI: 1.58–3.83, P < 0.0001) were identified as risk factors for AKAV infection in cattle, Table 2.

Table 2 Multivariate logistic regression analysis for risk factors associated with Akabane virus infection in cattle.

Discussion

Akabane diseases frequently occurred in places with tropical or subtropical climatic conditions, including Egypt. The epidemiological data on the disease in Egypt is very scarce. Thus, this study aimed to determine the seroprevalence of AD in some Egyptian governorates and assess the associated risk factors.

In the present study, the overall seroprevalence of AKAV antibodies in cattle was 24.4% and significantly varied across studied governorates with the highest seroprevalence rate of 36.2% in Alexandria and lowest seroprevalence rate of 15.6% was observed in Qalyubia governorate.

The reported seroprevalence rate was lower than previously recorded in Egypt (54.3%)20, Sudan (29.4 to 47%)19,29, and Nigeria (70.1%)17, but greater than that reported in China (21.3%)8. In addition, A serological survey of AKAV infection in two sentinel herds of calves in Saudi Arabia’s Central and Eastern regions revealed a 70% infection rate in the Al-Ahsa oasis, closer to Iran, while none of the examined cattle had antibodies to the virus30. Other studies stated that the seroprevalence rates were 20.32% in China31, 87% in Israel32, 0.14% in Turkey33.

Additionally, several studies conducted in the same study areas have reported the presence of antibodies against bluetongue virus (BTV) in cattle, and camels34,35 and against AKAV in sheep and goats36.

The variation in seropositivity for AKAV across different regions may be influenced by factors such as geographic location, sampling methods, the immunological status of the animals examined, age, climatic conditions, and the population density of vectors, particularly Culicoides34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41.

Regarding age, the seropositivity for AKAV differed significantly across the age categories of the examined cattle, with older cattle (over 5 years) showing the highest seroprevalence rate (35%) compared to the other age groups. This finding is consistent with the results of Metwally, et al.20, who reported a significantly higher seroprevalence in older cattle compared to younger and middle-aged cattle. Similarly, Karami Boldaji, et al.42 observed a significant increase in AKAV seroprevalence with age. Furthermore, Ahi, et al.43 found that infection in adult animals is widespread in endemic locations, although clinical disease reports are rare, while the neurological disease accompanied to the infection in cattle of 2 to 7 years age has been seen44. In line with our findings, Oluwayelu, et al.17 reported a higher seropositivity rate in adult cattle (86.4%) compared to younger cattle (14.3%). Conversely, Elhassan, et al.19 observed a greater seroprevalence increase in mid-aged cattle (45.3%) than in adults (34.8%). This can be explained by the fact that older animals are more likely to have been exposed multiple times to infected Culicoides vectors throughout their lives, increasing the likelihood of AKAV infection45,46,47,48.

Regarding sex, females showed a higher prevalence rate than males, which is consistent with the findings of Metwally, et al.20 and Karami Boldaji, et al.42. In addition, Consistent with a recent study conducted in Sudan, the prevalence of AKAV was higher in females (33%) compared to males (14.3%)19. This suggests that dairy herds, which often breed females, provide conducive environments for the habitat of insect vectors19,49. Although Akabane virus affects both male and female cattle equally, it is often reported more frequently in males due to several management and exposure factors. Male cattle, especially breeding bulls, are typically kept for longer periods in herds compared to females, increasing their chances of exposure to the virus over time. In addition, males are often managed in environments with greater exposure to biting insects, such as Culicoides midges and mosquitoes, which are responsible for virus transmission14,19,50,51,52.

Moreover, the highest seropositivity was observed in imported Holstein cattle (29.5%) and Mixed cattle (16.7%), which come in agreement with findings of Metwally, et al.20. Dairy heifers from high-milk-producing breeds, such as Holstein, are often imported from Europe and raised for life in intensive dairy farms53. While, Mixed breeds are crossbreeds produced by the mating of native breed and foreign cattle, and they are typically raised on smallholder or semi-intensive farms, either alone or alongside other cattle breeds54. The significant variation in seropositivity among breeds may be the farming systems in which the cattle were raised. Consequently, it is anticipated that raising Mixed and Holstein breeds together under Egyptian farming conditions may heighten the likelihood of AKAV transmission between them55,56,57,58,59,60.

The results of the present study supports findings of19 that season is a risk factor for AKAV transmission. Seroprevalence rates increased significantly during the winter season compared to other seasons. Climatic condition of studied areas including warm temperatures, moderate rainfall, and higher humidity, have a significant impact on increasing the spread of mosquitoes and the Akabane virus in the selected governorates61,62.

The present finding lies in line with previous results of Elhassan, et al.19, where the seroprevalence of AKAV infection increased significantly among cattle with history of abortion or reproductive problems than apparent healthy animals. The high prevalence of infertility and abortion in Egypt underscores the importance of AKAV infection in bovine reproductive health, indicating a need for further investigation63,64. The higher prevalence of Akabane virus infection in cattle with a history of abortion is mainly attributed to the virus’s pathogenic effects on the developing fetus. Akabane virus is a well-known cause of reproductive disorders in cattle, including abortions, stillbirths, and congenital deformities65.

Conclusion

This study clearly confirmed the presence of AKAV antibodies in dairy cattle in Egypt. The lack of clinically predictable signs associated with AKAV infections, along with significant outbreaks of abortion and fetal malformations, may contribute to an underestimation of the disease’s importance in Egypt. The multivariable logistic regression model revealed that locality, age, sex, season, breed and history of abortion had significant effect on likelihood of AKAV infection in cattle. Because of livestock production is a vital sector of the Egyptian economy, further investigations into the epidemiology and socio-economic impacts of AKAV should be pursued.