Table 3 The results of the comparison between the proposed optimizer and various examined optimizers.

From: Classification of Indian classical dances using MnasNet architecture with advanced polar fox optimization for hyperparameter optimization

 

APFO

POA

SCA

MF

SD

MF

SD

MF

SD

CEC01

0.796859

0

3413.097

16,676.41

80,815.93

22,633.1

CEC02

0.799076

0

3.555108

0

13.49474

0.214641

CEC03

0.864913

0

10.47128

0

8.783841

0.000214

CEC04

0.794733

0

24.81241

11.93763

12,043.46

3121.575

CEC05

0.85548

0

1.172947

0.055744

3.698796

0.534545

CEC06

0.874432

0

3.040226

0.48873

10.12815

0.458413

CEC07

0.785605

0

99.69755

9.321403

1033.568

205.092

CEC08

0.850515

0

4.514636

0.230393

4.934949

0.26214

CEC09

0.778501

0

1.699091

1.15E-10

1462.464

401.6464

CEC10

0.785029

0

2.155942

7.28E-16

15.52545

0.120337

 

WHO

BOA

 

MF

SD

MF

SD

MF

SD

CEC01

1.24E+10

9.47E+09

3248.412

14,430.36

4.87E + 10

5.08E + 10

CEC02

14.43319

0

3.377583

2.73E-09

54.67415

58.91758

CEC03

9.678387

9.37E-09

10.34602

1.28E-11

11.1394

0.000472

CEC04

73.99358

79.34229

27.43401

13.44571

230.6067

277.0503

CEC05

0.901286

0.181455

1.634316

0.070372

1.725196

0.318608

CEC06

3.525361

1.908109

8.340457

0.451247

7.010512

1.417151

CEC07

376.6467

248.33

89.25242

12.13193

524.3641

239.0038

CEC08

4.468011

0.287706

5.169955

0.547095

5.224728

0.364609

CEC09

2.465341

0.310589

1.503689

1.28E-10

4.326171

2.698636

CEC10

15.83094

0.116264

2.020981

7.72E-16

14.72933

0.132689

Back to article page