Table 8 Comparison between the proposed model and the other pretrained models based on various aspects.

From: A hybrid filtering and deep learning approach for early Alzheimer’s disease identification

Aspect

VGG19

ResNet152V2

InceptionV3

EfficientNetB0

Proposed Model

Parameter

More parameters

More parameters

More parameters

Less parameters

Fewer parameters

 

(\(\tilde{1}\)43.7M)

(\(\tilde{6}\)0.4M)

(\(\tilde{2}\)3.9M)

(\(\tilde{5}\).3M)

(\(\tilde{1}\)4.5M)

Model

Larger, generating

Larger model size,

Larger, leading to

Smaller model than

Smaller, facilitating

Size

slower inference

slower inference

slower inference

EfficientNetV2B3

faster inference

Training

Longer due to

Moderate training

Longer due to

Shorter due to

Typically shorter for

Time

increased number

time

more parameters

fewer parameters

fewer parameters

 

of parameters

    

Feature

Effective but less

Effective at

Effective but not

Efficient, but less

More effective at

Extraction

efficient than

extracting

as efficient

so compared

obtaining relevant

 

EfficientNetV2B3

relevant features

as EfficientNetV2B3

to EfficientNetV2B3

features from MRIscans

Heatmap

Generate less precise

Detailed heatmaps

Detailed heatmaps

Generates precise

Generates more

Precision

heatmaps than

but less refined

but less refined

heatmaps but less

refined and

 

EfficientNetV2B3

  

detailed than V2B3

precise heatmaps

Interpret-

Good; but, heatmaps

High interpretability

High, but heatmaps

High, but less refined

Higher due to refined

ability

can have less detail

with

can be less detailed

than V2B3

heatmaps, making it easier

  

detailed heatmaps

  

to interpret brain regions

Scalability

Less scalable compared

Good scalability

Good scalability

Good scalability

Better scalability with

 

to EfficientNetV2B3

   

compound scaling