Table 1 Summary of reviewed studies on brain tumor classification.
Study | Model(s) used | Dataset(s) | Accuracy (%) | Key contributions and findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Nassar et al.15 | Combination of 5 TL models | 3064 T1W-CE MRI (Figshare) images from 233 patients | 99.31 | Developed an efficient automated method for classifying brain tumors, combining strengths of five different models for improved performance. |
Agarwal et al.16 | ODTWCHE and Inception V3 | 3064 T1W-CE MRI (Figshare) images | 98.89 | Proposed an Auto Contrast Enhancer, Tumor Detector, and Classifier for improved contrast and early diagnosis of brain tumors, outperforming models like AlexNet, VGG-16, and ResNet-50. |
Talukder et al.17 | Xception, ResNet50V2, InceptionResNetV2, DenseNet201 | Figshare (3064 MRI) | 99.68 | Proposed TL models with ResNet50V2 achieving the highest accuracy for brain tumor classification. |
Dahan et al.18 | ResNet50 CNN and Marine Predator Algorithm (MPA) | 3064 T1W-CE MRI (Figshare) images | 98.72 | Developed a three-step model using ResNet50 for feature extraction and MPA for feature fusion, achieving high accuracy in detecting brain tumors in challenging images. |
Islam et al.19 | EfficientNetB0, EfficientNetB3 | 3064 T1W-CE MRI (Figshare) images | 99.69 | Introduced a deep learning approach using EfficientNet for enhanced classification, with EfficientNetB3 achieving the highest accuracy, outperforming many state-of-the-art methods. |
Tummala et al.20 | ViT models (L/16, B/16, L/32, B/32) | Figshare (3-class MRI) | 98.70 | Showcased the effectiveness of ensemble ViT models in three-class brain tumor classification. |
Abd-Ellah et al.21 | BTC-fCNN (custom CNN architecture) | Figshare (3064 MRI) | 98.86 | Developed a custom 13-layer CNN architecture, BTC-fCNN, outperforming existing CNN strategies for brain tumor detection. |
Maruf et al.22 | EfficientNetB3, DenseNet121, EfficientNetB2/B4/B5 | Figshare (3064 MRI) | 98.98 | EfficientNetB3 outperformed 26 other CNN models, showing excellent performance in brain tumor classification. |
Asif et al.23 | DenseNet121, ResNet152V2, Xception, DenseNet201, InceptionResNetV2 | Figshare MRI Dataset | 99.67 | Designed a DL architecture for both three-class and four-class classification, outperforming state-of-the-art methods. |
Nassar et al.24 | GoogleNet, ShuffleNet, SqueezeNet, AlexNet, NASNet-Mobile | Figshare (3064 MRI) | 99.31 | Introduced a majority voting technique with multiple models, achieving favorable results in brain tumor classification. |
Saeedi et al.25 | 2D CNN, Convolutional Autoencoder | Figshare MRI Dataset | 96.47 | Proposed 2D CNN and autoencoder networks with multiple convolution and pooling layers for brain tumor classification. |
Ait Younes et al.26 | CNN with Bayesian Optimization | Figshare MRI Dataset | 98.70 | Applied Bayesian optimization for hyperparameter tuning, achieving superior performance in brain tumor classification. |
Ayadi et al.27 | CNN (custom architecture) | Figshare, Radiopaedia, Rembrandt | 97.22 | Evaluated on multiple datasets, the CNN model achieved strong classification accuracy with minimal preprocessing. |