Abstract
This study investigated the mediating roles of Executive Function, Approximate Number System, and Receptive Vocabulary Skills in Family Socioeconomic Status and Cardinality Principle. A cross-sectional research design was used in this study. The study included 130 young children (63 boys and 67 girls, mean age = 68.52 ± 7.37 months) and their parents. Correlation analyses revealed significant positive correlations between children’s understanding of the Cardinality Principle and Family Socioeconomic Status, Executive Function, Approximate Number System, and Receptive Vocabulary Skills. After controlling for children’s gender and age, mediation analyses indicated that Family Socioeconomic Status significantly and positively affected children’s base comprehension. At the same time, Executive Function, Receptive Vocabulary Number System, and Receptive Vocabulary Skills all mediate the relationship between Family Socioeconomic Status and children’s Cardinality Principle to some extent.
Similar content being viewed by others
The cardinal principle (CP) states that individuals can understand that the last number reflects the total number of items in a set when counting1. Once children have mastered CP, they can meaningfully interpret any number mentioned during counting2. CP is a key milestone in the development of children’s number concepts and an important core indicator for predicting subsequent mathematical achievements3,4. Studies have shown that early CP comprehension can significantly predict first-grade math scores1performance in number system knowledge5complexity of arithmetic strategies used, and problem-solving skills6. Therefore, revealing the influence mechanism of CP has important practical value for early mathematical intervention.
Recent research has increasingly highlighted the associations among family socioeconomic status (SES), young children’s executive function (EF), approximate number system (ANS), and receptive vocabulary skills (RVS) with the development of CP. However, findings in the existing literature regarding the relationships among these factors and CP are inconsistent. Some studies indicate that SES significantly impacts young children’s CP7,8while others suggest that this effect may be mediated by children’s cognitive abilities9,10. Similarly, diverse studies offer varying evidence and interpretations regarding the roles of EF, ANS, and RVS in CP development11,12,13,14,15.
Given these discrepancies, there is a pressing need for a more comprehensive and systematic exploration of the relationships between SES and young children’s CP development, particularly focusing on the mediating roles of EF, ANS, and RVS. While previous studies have provided valuable insights for future research, several shortcomings remain. First, the applicability of the relationships between SES and CP within the Chinese cultural context has yet to be established. Second, existing literature lacks a standardized examination of the relationships among EF, ANS, RVS, and CP. Moreover, few studies have examined the parallel multiple mediations of EF, ANS, and RVS when SES influences CP in young children. To address these gaps, this study collected data on young children’s SES, EF, ANS, RVS, and CP, analyzing it using SPSS 29.0 and the PROCESS plug-in to explore the direct and indirect relationships of SES on CP. Specifically, this study aims to answer the following questions:
-
(a)
How is SES related to the development of CP in young children in China?
-
(b)
How are EF, ANS, and RVS related to young children’s CP?
-
(c)
Can parallel multiple mediation models with EF, ANS, and RVS acting as independent mediators explain the relationship between SES and CP acquisition in young children?
Effects of family socioeconomic status on young children’s cardinality principle
SES is a multidimensional construct reflecting a family’s access to and control of various social resources. It is often expressed through the social capital of family members, encompassing aspects such as power and prestige, thereby highlighting individual differences in access to actual and potential resources16. Various assessment criteria have been employed in academic research to determine young children’s SES. Despite the diversity of these approaches, it is common practice to evaluate SES based on indicators such as family income, parental education levels, and occupational status17.
The impact of SES on young children’s early mathematical learning is significant. Numerous studies have demonstrated that children from lower SES backgrounds face various challenges in learning mathematics, including difficulties in generating interest, building confidence, acquiring mathematical knowledge, and applying advanced problem-solving skills18,19,20. These challenges undermine their mathematical abilities and exacerbate existing inequalities in educational achievement21. The roles of SES are particularly evident in early childhood, especially regarding learning the cardinality principle (CP). Research has consistently shown that preschoolers from low-income families lag behind their higher SES peers in CP understanding even before formal schooling begins, mainly due to their limited exposure to math-related resources and activities at home7,17,22,23. This early learning gap may further amplify deficits in mathematical skills as children enter formal education8. Consequently, we propose the following research hypothesis:
Hypothesis 1 (H1): Young children’s CP level increases with SES.
Executive function as a mediator of family socioeconomic status and young children’s cardinality principle
EF encompasses a set of cognitive abilities that facilitate goal-directed behaviours essential for effective academic and daily life performance24. This construct includes components such as inhibitory control, working memory, and cognitive flexibility, all of which emerge in early childhood and continue to develop into adulthood25,26. These skills are crucial for self-regulation, attention, and task-switching, all of which play foundational roles in the learning process, particularly in mathematics27,28. The association between EF and mathematical competence is well-established29,30,31. However, research linking EF to CP in young children remains relatively sparse. Recent neuroscientific studies have identified critical brain regions, including the prefrontal, orbitofrontal, and anterior cingulate cortices, as vital for maintaining EF32. Additionally, the occipital-parietal-frontal network plays a significant role in number processing33suggesting shared physiological and cognitive mechanisms between EF and CP. While some studies indicate a positive predictive relationship between EF and young children’s mastery of CP11,34others report no significant connection12,35.
The role of EF in bridging the gap between SES and academic achievement has garnered increasing attention21,36,37particularly in the context of developing mathematical skills38,39,40. For instance, a study found that performance on the Tower of Hanoi task (an EF indicator) mediated the relationship between income and math and reading achievements for third graders38. Another study demonstrated that EF mediated the association between SES and math achievement even after controlling for verbal abilities41. Further research by Lawson and Farah39 confirmed the partial mediating role of EF between SES and changes in math achievement. Moreover, Waters et al.40 found that working memory, as a component of EF, mediated the relationship between parental education and young children’s math achievement. Based on these findings, we hypothesize that EF is closely linked to CP and may mediate the relationship between SES and CP learning, although this hypothesis requires further empirical investigation.
Hypothesis 2 (H2): EF partially mediates the relationship between SES and CP.
Approximate number system as a mediator of family socioeconomic status and young children’s cardinality principle
The ANS has a complex relationship with the concept of cardinality. ANS enables individuals to make rapid, approximate quantitative judgments without relying on precise counting or symbolic numbers42. Numerous studies highlight the importance of ANS for understanding CP. Cognitive neuroscience research has identified the intraparietal sulcus—a key brain region associated with ANS—as critical for numerical cognition, suggesting a link between ANS and CP43. Empirical evidence further supports that ANS is essential for developing CP in young children12,13,44,45. However, some studies present opposing views; for example, Schröder et al.46 found that ANS acuity at 1.5 years did not significantly influence the later acquisition of CP. Additionally, some researchers argue that ANS and mathematical skills may function independently47,48,49.
Despite these conflicting perspectives, most evidence suggests that ANS facilitates young children’s understanding of early mathematical concepts50,51,52. Young children with higher ANS acuity are more likely to grasp symbolic quantitative knowledge, such as cardinal number understanding and computational skills53,54,55. Traditionally, the development of ANS has been thought to be primarily influenced by genetic and biological factors56. However, recent research indicates that environmental factors, particularly SES, can significantly impact young children’s ANS performance10,57,58. For example, McNeil et al.57 found that children from moderate to high SES backgrounds exhibited significantly higher ANS acuity than their low SES counterparts. Similarly, Bachman et al.10 confirmed a positive correlation between SES and ANS accuracy.
Conversely, some studies have found no significant associations between parental education, household income, and ANS accuracy in preschool samples59,60,61. These discrepancies may stem from the reliance on single SES indicators10. The current research on the relationship between SES and ANS remains inconsistent, and existing studies often lack a comprehensive approach to SES measurement. Moreover, the interplay between SES and ANS has been underexplored in the context of Chinese culture. Therefore, this study aims to reexamine the relationships among SES, ANS, and CP in Chinese preschoolers, employing a more comprehensive set of SES indicators, including family income, parental educational background, and occupational information. Considering the potential link between SES and ANS, along with the role of ANS in young children’s learning of mathematical concepts, we propose the following hypothesis:
Hypothesis 3 (H3): ANS partially mediates the relationship between SES and CP.
Receptive vocabulary skills as a mediator of family socioeconomic status and young children’s cardinality principle
RVS refer to an individual’s ability to understand and recognize vocabulary62 and has gained increasing attention in the context of young children’s mathematics learning. Language skills are considered indispensable for mathematics acquisition63prompting researchers to explore the potential link between RVS and the cardinality principle (CP).
Several theoretical frameworks emphasize the crucial role of RVS in young children’s comprehension of mathematical terms and concepts. For instance, Barner64 argues that young children learn to utilize number concepts by first mastering singular and plural forms, such as “one dog” and “two dogs.” Similarly, Spelke65 posits that the development of noun phrases (e.g., “two rabbits”) is essential for understanding the meaning of the initial number words. Other scholars suggest that stronger RVS enhances young children’s ability to access math-related linguistic information during social interactions, which subsequently enriches their mathematical terminology and deepens their conceptual understanding66,67. However, empirical findings on this relationship have been inconsistent14,15,68. For example, Pixner et al.68 found a significant correlation between young children’s understanding of base ten numbers and their vocabulary skills. Chow and Ekholm15 reported that RVS did not predict young children’s math achievement.
RVS may serve as a mediating factor between SES and young children’s CP development. Research indicates that children from high-SES families generally outperform their peers from low to moderate-SES backgrounds in vocabulary skills69,70,71,72. The Family Investment Model suggests that high-SES parents are better positioned to provide their children with rich educational resources and high-quality learning environments73,74,75. Furthermore, SES disparities are evident in the quality of parent-child interactions—such as communication, sensitivity, and supportiveness—and the availability of learning resources, including books and toys76,77. These factors significantly influence young children’s vocabulary development.
The interplay between SES, vocabulary, and mathematical proficiency is critical. Poor language development can hinder foundational early math knowledge acquisition, particularly for children from low-SES backgrounds78. Studies have shown that preschoolers from middle-SES families outperform their low-income peers on verbal forms of number combination and math story problems79,80,81. This advantage is attributed to the mastery of number vocabulary, which facilitates performance on mathematical tasks82. Deficits in number vocabulary among low-SES preschoolers may contribute to delays in their math skill development83.
Although SES, vocabulary, and young children’s math skills are strongly correlated, the specific relationships among SES, RVS, and young children’s CP have not been thoroughly investigated. Given the complex interactions among these variables, we hypothesize that RVS may elucidate the relationship between SES and the development of young children’s CP.
Hypothesis 4 (H4): RVS partially mediates the relationship between SES and CP.
According to the research hypothesis proposed above, a multiple-parallel mediation model was constructed in this study, as shown in Fig. 1.
Theoretical model of mediation of EF, ANS, and RVS between SES and CP.
Method
Participants
The research team collaborated with several public kindergartens in Urumqi and Changji regions to conduct the study. Invitation letters were sent to parents throughout kindergarten to introduce the study’s purpose, process, and benefits. At the same time, recruitment information and contact information were posted in the online community of kindergarten parents. The teacher calls the invitation for parents who cannot access online information. Participants had to have children between the ages of 3 and 7 years; No intellectual or hearing impairment; Vision was normal or corrected. Families were initially screened at the time of recruitment and further invited if they met the criteria. A total of 145 children were recruited. Their parents completed SES information through online and offline questionnaires, and 145 valid questionnaires were collected. In addition to the three key items used to assess SES: parental education level, occupation and annual household income, the questionnaire also contains some questions to collect basic demographic information, such as children’s gender and age. After the exclusion of absence due to illness, scheduling conflicts, and incomplete data, 130 valid cases (63 males, 67 females, mean age 68.52 months, SD = 7.367) were finally used for analysis. SES was assessed according to parental education, family income, and occupation, as shown in Table 1.
Measures
Family socioeconomic status (SES)
Drawing on Ren’s84 methodology, this study assesses SES using parental education level, occupation, and annual household income as indicators. First, quantitative values are assigned to the three indicators, which are then converted into a standardized score, Z. Next, principal component analysis is used to determine the factor loadings of the indicators. The formula is SES = (β1*Z Parental Education level + β2*Z Parents’ occupation + β3*Z Average gross monthly household income)/εf. β represents the factor loadings of each indicator, and εf is the eigenvalue of the first factor. A high SES score indicates a high SES in the family. In the present study, Cronbach’s α of the scale was 0.700.
Executive function
The assessment of EF is based on the average score of the three tasks. Specifically, scores were obtained by the day-night Stroop task, digital recall task, and Dimension variation card sorting test (DCCS), and then the average scores for these three tasks were calculated as the total EF score.
Inhibitory Control: The Day-Night Stroop Task was utilised as devised by Marcovitch et al.85. At the beginning of the experiment, participants were shown pictures of the sun and the moon and helped to establish the concepts of “sun for day” and “moon for night”. The participants were then told the task rules: “night” when they saw the sun and “day” when they saw the moon. The experimental material consisted of 10 pictures of the sun and 10 pictures of the moon, and the two pictures were presented randomly. Participants were given five practice sessions to familiarize themselves with the rules of the task, and 20 formal tests were performed after the sessions. One point is awarded for each correct answer, and no point is awarded for each incorrect answer. The total score ranges from 0 to 20 points.
Working Memory: The Digit Recall task was adapted from Gathercole et al.86. Before the test, the task rules were explained to the subjects: the tester read the numbers at one number per second, asked the subjects to recall the numbers in order, and led the subjects to practice 1–2 lists. The formal test starts with a List of Lengths 1, and if the subject correctly recalls four groups of numbers of the same length, the test proceeds to the following List of Lengths. The test is stopped if the subject continuously incorrectly recalls three sets of numbers of the same length. The test consists of 7 lists ranging in length from 1 to 7 digits, and each List length contains 3 groups of numbers, each group of numbers being non-repetitive random numbers from 1 to 9. One point is awarded for correct answers, no points are awarded for incorrect answers, and the total score ranges from 0 to 21 points.
Cognitive Flexibility: This subtask is based on the Dimension Change Card Sorting Task (DCCS) designed by Zelazo87. Before the test, the participants were shown pictures of red and blue cats and boats and told that the cards with the same colour should be grouped when classifying by colour. When sorting by shape, cards with the same shape must be grouped. Before the formal test, the subjects were led to conduct 6 practice tests: classified by “shape” 3 times and classified by “colour” 3 times. The formal test consisted of 2 groups, each required to be classified by “shape” and “colour” 12 times, 24 times. One point is awarded for correct answers, no points are awarded for incorrect answers, and the total score ranges from 0 to 24 points.
Approximate number system
ANS was measured using Halberda et al.’s44 Panamath software, where children compared quantities of yellow and blue dots. They had 3000 milliseconds to determine which colour had more dots. The task consisted of 8 practice tests and 80 formal tests, of which 40 tests had more yellow dots and 40 tests had more blue dots. After the test is over, the software will automatically generate test results, namely response time, accuracy rate and Weber coefficient, among which accuracy is the main criterion45,88. This test method has been proven suitable for Chinese children88.
Receptive vocabulary skills
RVS were assessed using the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised (PPVT-R), modified by Guo et al.89. Participants were trained three times before the formal assessment, which involved selecting pictures corresponding to words read in Mandarin. Each correct answer received one point, while incorrect responses received no points. The test comprised 120 questions and was discontinued if the child made six consecutive errors. The final score was calculated as the number of correct answers minus the number of incorrect answers.
Cardinality Principle
By combing the existing studies, it is found that the paradigms for assessing children’s CP roughly include verbal counting, number trial, How Many task and Give-N task. However, compared with verbal counting and number recognition, the How Many and Give-N tasks are more common, more accurate, and more effective ways to test children’s use of CP90. For example, Paliwal and Baroody91 used the How Many and Give-N task to assess CP development in young children aged 2–4 years. Therefore, in this study, children were tested with the How many and Give-N task to assess their CP development. The study employed the How Many and Give-N tasks to assess CP, based on Zhao92 and Zhang93. CP scores are calculated based on the average of How Many and Give-N task scores. In the How Many Task, the tester presented blocks and asked children to count them and state the total. In the Give-N Task, the tester instructed the children to retrieve a specified number of blocks. Both tasks were administered 9 times, with each correct response scored as 1 point and incorrect responses not scored. The scoring range for each task was 0–9 points. In this study, Cronbach’s α was 0.850 for How Many tasks and 0.885 for Give-N tasks. These values indicate acceptable internal consistency and reliability for both tasks.
Covariates
Numerous studies have shown that young children’s age is closely related to the development of EF94ANS44vocabulary acquisition95and CP96. Secondly, the gender difference in the early cognitive domain has been confirmed by many studies. Some research suggests that boys may temporarily be advantageous in number-related tasks97while girls tend to outperform in EF tasks98. Given the complex associations of age and sex with EF, ANS, RVS, and CP, this study aimed to control for possible confounding by young children’s age and gender and, thus, more precisely explore the relationship between SES and CP. To ensure the accuracy and reliability of the research results and to reveal the internal relationship between various factors in more depth.
Ethical approval and consent to participate
The study was conducted following the Declaration of Helsinki. The authors obtained informed consent from all children’s parents or legal guardians to participate in the research, and informed consent was obtained from a parent and/or legal guardian. Each participant could withdraw from the study at any stage of the project. The research was conducted following relevant guidelines and regulations with the consent and under the University Committee on Human Research Protection supervision at Shanghai Normal University No. 2,023,035.
Data collection occurred in May 2024 and was conducted by six professionally trained researchers. Each child was tested individually in a quiet environment for approximately 25 to 40 min, with all instructions delivered in Mandarin. After the assessment, participants received stickers as a reward.
Data analysis
This study used SPSS 29.0 software and SPSS PROCESS v4.1 plug-in to analyze the data statistically. First, descriptive statistics and correlation analysis were used to explore the interrelationships among the variables. Then, mediation role tests were conducted based on the traditional stepwise regression method, with statistical significance at p < 0.05, p < 0.01 and p < 0.001. In addition, a nonparametric bootstrap method (5000 samples) was utilized to assess the significance of the total and indirect relationships. This study examines the mechanism of the influence of SES on CP using EF, ANS, and RVS as mediating variables and constructs a parallel multiple mediation model.
.
In the model, CP stands for the cardinality principle, SES stands for family socioeconomic status, EF, ANS, and RVS stands for executive function, approximate number system, and receptive vocabulary skills, respectively, and control denotes the control variables. α0, β0, γ0, δ0 and η0 are the intercept terms. α1, β2, γ2, δ2 and η4 are the impact coefficients. ε1, ε2, ε3, ε4 and ε5 are the residuals. Model (1) analyzes the direct effect of SES on the CP, where c is the total impact coefficient. Model (2) examines the effect of SES on EF, where β1 is the influence coefficient. Model (3) examined the impact of SES on the ANS, with γ1 as the impact coefficient. Model (4) examined the effect of SES on RVS, with δ1 as the influence coefficient. Model (5) examined the effect of SES on CP, controlling for EF, ANS, and RVS, with c′ as the direct influence coefficient. η1, η2 and η3 are the influence coefficients of EF, ANS, and RVS on CP, respectively. The independent mediation effect consists of the following three paths: “SES → EF → CP”(Path 1), “SES → ANS → CP”(Path 2), and “SES → RVS → CP”(Path 3). The mediating effect values were β1η1, γ1η2, and δ1η3, and the sum of the three was the total mediating effect. Therefore, the total effect c of SES on CP consists of the direct effect c′ and the mediating effect together, i.e., c = c′ + β1η1 + γ1η2 + δ1η3. In addition, a partial mediation effect was observed if the total effect c was significant and at least one of the mediating paths (e.g., EF, ANS, or RVS) was also significant. If the total effect c was significant, all mediating paths were significant, and the direct effect c’ was not significant, it was a fully mediated effect.
Results
Descriptive statistics and correlation among the studied variables
Table 2 shows the results of descriptive statistics and correlation analyses for each variable. Age was associated with EF (r = 0.306, p < 0.001), ANS (r = 0.225, p < 0.05), RVS (r = 0.401, p < 0.001) and CP (r = 0.544, p < 0.001). In terms of gender, there was no significant correlation between each gender variable. The CP was positively correlated with SES (r = 0.432, p < 0.001), inhibitory control (r = 0.360, p < 0.001), working memory (r = 0.454, p < 0.001), cognitive flexibility (r = 0.423, p < 0. 001), total EF scores (r = 0.570, p < 0.001), ANS (r = 0.503, p < 0.001) and RVS (r = 0.571, p < 0.01) were positively correlated. Also, scores on two subtasks of the CP, how many and give-n, were significantly and positively correlated with these variables. Second, positive correlations were also found between SES and inhibitory control (r = 0.329, p < 0.001), working memory (r = 0.236, p < 0.01), cognitive flexibility (r = 0.316, p < 0.001), total EF scores (r = 0.413, p < 0.001), ANS (r = 0.261, p < 0.01), and RVS (r = 0.303, p < 0.001). This provides the basis for mediation effect tests. In addition, the sample was divided into high and low groups by SES level using the median as the cut-off point. Subsequently, an independent samples t-test was used to analyze the differences in EF, ANS, RVS and CP between the two groups, aiming to test whether the above variables were statistically significant at different SES levels. According to the data in Table 3, there were statistically significant differences between different SES levels of young children in EF (t =−4.241, Cohen’s d= −0.748, p < 0.001), ANS (t =−2.930, Cohen’s d= −0.963, p < 0.01), RVS (t =−2.875, Cohen’s d= −0.504, p < 0.01), and CP (t = −5.153, Cohen’s d= −0.905, p < 0.001) were all statistically different from each other, suggesting that the EF, ANS, RVS, and CP scores of the high SES group were significantly higher than those of the low SES group.
Test for multiple parallel mediation
In this study, multivariate stratified regression analyses were conducted using the SPSS macro program Process developed by Hayes99which was used to test for mediating roles. According to the results of the correlation analysis, the age of children was included as a covariate in the mediation model analysis. The regression showed that SES significantly and positively predicted CP (β = 0.303, t = 4.211, p < 0.001), and the results were significant even after inputting EF, ANS, and RVS (β = 0.144, t = 2.219, p < 0.05). In addition, data from Models 1, 2, and 3 indicated that SES positively predicted EF (β = 0.355, t = 4.339, p < 0.001), ANS (β = 0.216, t = 2.461, p < 0.05), and RVS (β = 0.209, t = 2.536, p < 0.05). Thus, EF, ANS, and RVS partially mediate the relationship between SES and young children’s CP, respectively, as shown in Table 4.
The indirect relationship was tested using a bootstrap method with 5,000 random samples. A significant mediation effect was indicated if the confidence interval did not include 0. The test results show (Table 5) that the direct path effect value for SES → CP is 0.144 (95%CI =[0.028, 0.013], not including 0). This SES can directly predict the CP. The indirect path effect value for Path 1 is 0.064 (95%CI =[0.015, 0.129], not including 0). This suggests that the EF is partially associated with the relationship between SES and the CP, with the indirect link representing 0.064/0.303 = 21.12% of the total association. The indirect path effect value for Path 2 is 0.046 (95% CI = [0.009, 0.095], excluding 0). This suggests that the ANS is partially associated with the relationship between SES and the CP, with the indirect link representing 0.046/0.303 = 15.18% of the total association.The indirect path effect value for Path 3 is 0.050 (95% CI = [0.009, 0.099], not including 0). This suggests that RVS is partially associated with the relationship between SES and the CP, with the indirect link representing 0.050/0.303 = 16.50% of the total association. Consequently, mediating roles 1, 2, and 3 were significant, with a total indirect association of 0.159 (95% CI =[0.077, 0.247], not including 0). Together, they explained 0.159/0.303 = 52.48% of the total association. A mediating model of EF, ANS, and RVS is shown in Fig. 2.
Model of the Mediating Role of Young Children’s EF, ANS, and RVS between SES and CP.
Discussion
The findings of this study contribute to the understanding of how SES, EF, ANS, and RVS serve as predictors of young children’s CP, particularly within the context of Chinese culture. This study is the first to explore the mediating role of EF, ANS, and RVS between SES and CP in young children. This study provides important theoretical support for exploring cognitive development in young children and also provides the scientific basis for practical guidance and intervention strategy design in related fields.
It should be noted that the present findings help to address several inconsistencies in the existing literature. While previous studies have reported different conclusions regarding the role of EF, ans, and RVS in CP development, our parallel mediation model provides a potential explanation for these differences. First of all, methodological differences are an important source of divergent results. Earlier single-mediator studies (e.g., examining only EF or ANS) may be biased by ignoring compensatory mechanisms in the cognitive domain. For example, children with weaker ANS may compensate for disadvantages by strengthening executive control strategies (e.g., finger counting). Second, cultural specificity explains the weight differences in mediation pathways. Chinese culture emphasizes the importance of education and collectivist values, which may influence how families invest in and support their children’s education. For example, Chinese families usually place a high value on their children’s academic achievement, which may be reflected in their enthusiasm to provide their children with abundant learning resources and to participate in educational activities. The Chinese education system focuses on the development of math and language skills in the early education stage, which may have promoted the development of young children in EF, ANS and RVS, thus influencing their understanding of the CP. Unlike Western studies that emphasize the mediation dominance of language, this study found that the mediating strength of EF in Chinese children is equivalent to language, which is consistent with the characteristics of East Asian education that focuses more on executive function training98. Such cultural differences suggest that socioeconomic predictions are context-dependent, and the possible mediators must be reexamined in a cross-cultural framework.
Family socioeconomic status as a predictor of young children’s cardinality principle
The results indicate that SES significantly predicts young children’s performance on CP tasks, affirming the first research hypothesis. Higher SES is associated with better outcomes in CP tasks, aligning with ecological systems theory, which posits that interconnected environmental factors significantly influence cognitive development100.
According to the Family Investment Model, families with higher SES typically provide better educational resources, including high-quality early education programs, learning materials, and extracurricular activities17,101,102. Such resources enhance children’s mathematical learning opportunities, directly impacting their CP development. Moreover, parents from higher SES backgrounds often engage more actively in their children’s education, recognizing the importance of early cognitive stimulation. This engagement is supported by research indicating that a 10% increase in household income correlates with a significant rise in parental investment in early childhood education103. Positive parent-child interactions, such as number recognition and counting during everyday activities, provide enriching learning experiences and foundational mathematical skills104. Furthermore, children from high SES families generally benefit from better health care and nutrition, fostering physical health and cognitive development, which are crucial for CP105,106.
The mediating role of executive function
The findings also highlight the partial mediating role of EF in the relationship between SES and CP, supporting the second research hypothesis and corroborating previous studies10. EF is critical for behavioural regulation, attention, and cognitive flexibility, essential for mathematical learning27,28. Children utilize inhibitory control to focus on relevant information and ignore distractions during math tasks. Additionally, motor-assisted counting, such as using fingers, aids in maintaining attention and reducing cognitive load107.
Families with high SES typically provide rich cognitive stimulation that enhances EF development, while low SES families often lack resources for educational investment, impeding EF growth17,108. Furthermore, low-income families frequently face challenging environments characterized by instability and stress, which can adversely affect brain development and EF109,110,111. Consequently, impairments in EF can hinder children’s ability to process quantitative information and successfully engage in mathematical tasks112,113.
The mediating role of the approximate number system
This study demonstrated that the Approximate Number System (ANS) mediates the relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and young children’s understanding of the cardinality principle (CP), thereby supporting Hypothesis 3. Consistent with previous research, our findings indicate a positive association between the accuracy of the ANS and young children’s proficiency in mastering CP55,114,115,116. The ANS, an innate numerical system, equips preschoolers with an intuitive grasp of quantity, enabling them to process object counts without complete symbolic knowledge. This foundational skill aids in comprehending the order and fundamental meanings of number words53,117.
The findings corroborate the Early Developmental Model of Mathematics proposed by Geary54which posits that young children initially rely on their innate ANS for quantity judgment. Subsequently, they map verbal number words and Arabic numerals onto this system to grasp the quantities these symbols represent. The greater the accuracy of their ANS, the more profound their understanding and mastery of the CP. Neuroimaging studies further underscore the centrality of the ANS in numerical cognition, revealing that regions such as the intraparietal sulcus are crucial for processing numerical information118,119,120,121.
Furthermore, research has shown that early exposure to mathematics, particularly through home-based activities, significantly enhances ANS acuity122,123. Children from middle- and upper-income families often receive early mathematical instruction, leading to superior ANS performance. In contrast, children from low-income families typically lack such exposure, limiting their ANS development due to resource constraints. Consequently, lower ANS accuracy can hinder their comprehension of CP.
The mediating role of receptive vocabulary skills
The results of this study indicate that receptive vocabulary skills (RVS) partially mediate the relationship between SES and young children’s CP, validating Hypothesis 4. This aligns with previous findings highlighting language development deficits as obstacles to early math learning, especially for children from low-SES families78.
Neuroimaging research has identified that brain regions responsible for language processing, particularly within the language-dominant cortex, are also engaged when interpreting Arabic numerals124,125. As RVS plays a crucial role in language skills, its development significantly impacts children’s grasp of cardinal numbers, emphasizing the shared neural pathways between language and mathematics126. Vygotsky’s theory posits that while thinking and language have distinct origins, they eventually converge, with language structures shaping cognitive development127. In mathematics, this implies that robust language skills facilitate mathematical reasoning. According to Carey128children’s mastery of mathematical concepts requires proficiency in number names and their association with specific quantities, all dependent on strong RVS.
Families with higher SES tend to provide more material resources and engage in supportive interactions that enhance language development17,109. In contrast, lower SES families often experience constraints that limit verbal interactions and educational activities, adversely affecting RVS development17,129,130. Consequently, disparities in family SES manifest in young children’s understanding and mastery of CP, mediated by their RVS.
In addition, although age and gender were treated as covariates rather than focal variables, their roles deserve discussion. The findings suggest a significant positive correlation between age and CP. This conclusion is consistent with the results of previous studies96. With the growth as children age, their brains gradually mature, and the brain areas related to cardinality continue to improve so that their ability to understand numbers and quantities can be improved. According to Piaget’s theory of cognitive development, children are in the pre-operation stage, and their cognitive ability in this stage is mainly based on intuitive action thinking and concrete image thinking. With the growth of age, children’s thinking ability gradually transitions from simple perception and action operation to more complex logical thinking131. The zero sex effect of CP contrasts with previous reports of boys’ advantage in number tasks97. However, it is consistent with recent meta-analyses showing negligible sex differences in early cardinality understanding132. This phenomenon is because some scholars pointed out that this may be because children’s thinking levels, especially the concept of number thinking, have not yet differentiated. Thus, boys and girls have not yet shown significant differences in cardinality concept development.
Contributions, limitations, and future directions
This study highlights the direct and positive influence of SES on young children’s CP and its indirect roles mediated by EF, ANS, and RVS. Compared to previous studies, our findings clarify the roles of SES, EF, ANS, and RVS in shaping CP, offering a fresh perspective on the cognitive development of mathematics in early childhood. Additionally, the study elucidates the mechanisms through which SES affects CP, providing empirical support for relevant theoretical models.
The results of this study have important implications for education policy and practice, especially in low SES communities. The study highlights the importance of cognitive skills in shaping early mathematical ability by highlighting the mediating role of EF, ANS, and RVS in the relationship between SES and CP. For children of low socioeconomic status, who often do not have access to resources to develop these cognitive skills, targeted interventions can be designed to bridge this gap. These may include EF training programs that enhance inhibitory control, working memory, and cognitive flexibility; Involves a comparable number of ANS activities; And enriched language environments to facilitate RVS, all of which can be integrated into early childhood education curricula. In addition, the study’s findings call for policy initiatives to address the root causes of SES disparities, such as providing financial support and educational resources for low-SES families, improving the quality of early childhood education in low-income areas, and promoting parent-child interactions that favour cognitive development. Finally, while most previous studies focused on the Western context, this study revealed the Chinese context and provided valuable data for cross-cultural comparisons.
However, this study has several limitations. Firstly, the cross-sectional design limits the ability to infer dynamic relationships among variables over time. Future research should employ longitudinal designs to explore these developmental trajectories. Secondly, the sample size was restricted to specific regions and social groups, potentially limiting the generalizability of our findings. Future studies should aim for a broader, multi-regional and multi-cultural representation to enhance the robustness of the conclusions. Third, the How Many and Give-N tasks used in this study mainly focus on children’s performance in specific counting and extraction situations, which may not fully cover children’s use of CP in daily life. In the future, a variety of different tasks can be considered to evaluate children’s CP more comprehensively. Fourth, as this study focused on multiple parallel mediation, the chain mediating role of EF, ANS, and RVS between SES and CP could be considered in the future. Finally, this study did not consider other factors that affect young children’s math cognition, such as access to educational resources, family environment, parenting style, and genetic factors. Future research should cover these variables to better understand the factors that influence mathematics cognition in young children.
Conclusion
This study illuminates the mediating roles of EF, ANS, and RVS in the relationship between SES and young children’s understanding of the cardinality principle. It addresses a gap in the existing literature, particularly within the Chinese cultural context. By recruiting 130 children and their parents from various socioeconomic backgrounds and employing diverse measurement tools, we comprehensively assessed SES, EF, ANS, RVS, and CP mastery. The findings revealed that SES directly predicts young children’s CP and indirectly influences it through EF, ANS, and RVS. This research provides critical insights into how SES shapes young children’s understanding of CP by influencing their foundational cognitive skills, ultimately enhancing their mathematical comprehension.
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
O’Rear, C. D. & McNeil, N. M. Improved set-size labeling mediates the effect of a counting intervention on children’s Understanding of cardinality. Dev. Sci. 22, e12819. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12819 (2019).
Carey, S. Where our number concepts come from. J. Philos. 106, 220–254. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil2009106418 (2009).
Lai, M. L. et al. Fostering preschoolers’ acquisition of the cardinality principle. In Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development (Austin, TX). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.15965.20963 (2017).
Paliwal, V. & Baroody, A. J. How best to teach the cardinality principle. Early Child. Res. Q. 44, 152–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2018.03.012 (2018).
Geary, D. C. et al. Early conceptual Understanding of cardinality predicts superior school-entry number-system knowledge. Psychol. Sci. 29, 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617729817 (2017).
Chu, F. W., vanMarle, K., Rouder, J. & Geary, D. C. Children’s early Understanding of number predicts their later problem-solving sophistication in addition. J. Exp. Child. Psychol. 169, 73–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.12.010 (2018).
Ramani, G. B. & Siegler, R. S. Promoting broad and stable improvements in low-income children’s numerical knowledge through playing number board games. Child. Dev. 79, 375–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01131.x (2008).
Jordan, N. C., Kaplan, D., Ramineni, C. & Locuniak, M. N. Early math matters: kindergarten number competence and later mathematics outcomes. Dev. Psychol. 45, 850–867. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014939 (2009).
Duncan, R. J., McClelland, M. M. & Acock, A. C. Relations between executive function, behavioral regulation, and achievement: moderation by family income. J Appl. Dev. Psychol. 49, 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2017.01.004 (2017).
Bachman, H. J. et al. Associations among socioeconomic status and preschool-aged children’s number skills and Spatial skills: the role of executive function. J. Exp. Child. Psychol. 221, 105453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105453 (2022).
Purpura, D. J., Schmitt, S. A. & Ganley, C. M. Foundations of mathematics and literacy: the role of executive functioning components. J. Exp. Child. Psychol. 153, 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2016.08.010 (2017).
Fuhs, M. W., Hornburg, C. B. & McNeil, N. M. Specific early number skills mediate the association between executive functioning skills and mathematics achievement. Dev. Psychol. 52, 1217–1235. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000145 (2016).
Van Marle, K. et al. Attaching meaning to the number words: contributions of the object tracking and approximate number systems. Dev. Sci. 21, e12495. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12495 (2018).
Negen, J. & Sarnecka, B. W. Number-concept acquisition and general vocabulary development. Child. Dev. 83, 2019–2027. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01815.x (2012).
Chow, J. C. & Ekholm, E. Language domains differentially predict mathematics performance in young children. Early Child. Res. Q. 46, 179–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2018.02.011 (2019).
Zhang, W., Li, D. P. & Xie, Z. J. Low socioeconomic status and child development. J. South. China Norm Univ. (Soc Sci. Ed). 6, 104–112 (2007).
Bradley, R. H. & Corwyn, R. F. Socioeconomic status and child development. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 53, 371–399. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135233 (2002).
Barr, A. B. Family socioeconomic status, family health, and changes in students’ math achievement across high school: a mediational model. Soc. Sci. Med. 140, 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.06.028 (2015).
Rogelberg, S. L. et al. Examining motivation profiles within and across socioeconomic levels on educational outcomes. Int. J. Educ. Res. 109, 101846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2021.101846 (2021).
DePascale, M., Jaeggi, S. M. & Ramani, G. B. The influence of home environmental factors on kindergarten children’s addition strategy use. Front. Psychol. 13, 1027431. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1027431 (2023).
Ding, X., Li, S., Zhang, X. & Shi, J. N. The mediating role of executive function between socioeconomic status and academic achievement: a meta-analytic structural equation model. Learn. Individ Differ. 110, 102418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102418 (2024).
Saxe, G. B., Guberman, S. R. & Gearhart, M. Social processes in early number development. Monogr Soc. Res. Child. Dev. 52, 162. https://doi.org/10.2307/1166071 (1987).
Votruba-Drzal, E. Income changes and cognitive stimulation in young children’s home learning environments. J. Marriage Fam. 65, 341–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00341.x (2003).
Diamond, A. Executive functions. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 64, 135–168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750 (2013).
Best, J. R. & Miller, P. H. A developmental perspective on executive function. Child. Dev. 81, 1641–1660. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01499.x (2010).
Friedman, N. P. et al. Stability and change in executive function abilities from late adolescence to early adulthood: a longitudinal twin study. Dev. Psychol. 52, 326–340. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000075 (2016).
Bull, R. & Lee, K. Executive functioning and mathematics achievement. Child. Dev. Perspect. 8, 36–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12059 (2014).
Zhang, X. Linking language, visual-spatial, and executive function skills to number competence in very young Chinese children. Early Child. Res. Q. 36, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2015.12.010 (2016).
Blankson, A. N., Gudmundson, J. A. & Kondeh, M. Cognitive predictors of kindergarten achievement in African American young children. J. Educ. Psychol. 111, 1273–1283. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000346 (2019).
Ribner, A. D. et al. The role of executive function in shaping the longitudinal stability of math achievement during early elementary grades. Early Child. Res. Q. 64, 84–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2023.02.004 (2023).
Pelegrina, S. et al. Role of executive functions in the relations of state- and trait-math anxiety with math performance. Ann. N Y Acad. Sci. 1535, 76–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.15140 (2024).
Gao, Y. X. The cognitive-neural mechanism of young children’s inhibition processes: the ERP evidence from audio-visual cross-modal. Master’s Dissertation, Shandong Normal University (2009).
Thioux, M. et al. Category-specific representation and processing of numbers and animal names across semantic tasks: a PET study. NeuroImage 13, 617. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8119(01)91960-3 (2001).
Simanowski, S. & Krajewski, K. Specific preschool executive functions predict unique aspects of mathematics development: a 3-year longitudinal study. Child. Dev. 90, 544–561. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12909 (2019).
Goffin, C. & Ansari, D. Beyond magnitude: judging ordinality of symbolic number is unrelated to magnitude comparison and independently relates to individual differences in arithmetic. Cognition. 150, 68–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.01.018 (2016).
Fitzpatrick, C., McKinnon, R. D., Blair, C. B. & Willoughby, M. T. Do preschool executive function skills explain the school readiness gap between advantaged and disadvantaged children? Learn. Instr. 30, 25–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.11.003 (2014).
Micalizzi, L. et al. Effects of socioeconomic status and executive function on school readiness across levels of household chaos. Early Child. Res. Q. 47, 331–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2019.01.007 (2019).
Crook, S. R. & Evans, G. W. The role of planning skills in the income-achievement gap. Child. Dev. 85, 405–411. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12129 (2014).
Lawson, G. M. & Farah, M. J. Executive function as a mediator between SES and academic achievement throughout childhood. Int. J. Behav. Dev. 41, 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025415603489 (2017).
Waters, N. E. et al. Pathways from socioeconomic status to early academic achievement: the role of specific executive functions. Early Child. Res. Q. 54, 321–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2020.09.008 (2021).
Dilworth-Bart, J. E. Does executive function mediate SES and home quality associations with academic readiness. Early Child. Res. Q. 27, 416–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2012.02.002 (2012).
Xu, F. & Spelke, E. S. Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants. Cognition. 74, B1–B11. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00066-9 (2000).
Dehaene, S. et al. Cerebral activations during number multiplication and comparison: a PET study. Neuropsychologia 34, 1097–1106. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(96)00027-9 (1996).
Halberda, J. & Feigenson, L. Developmental change in the acuity of the number sense: the approximate number system in 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-year-olds and adults. Dev. Psychol. 44, 1457–1465. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012682 (2008).
Inglis, M. & Gilmore, C. Indexing the approximate number system. Acta Psychol. 145, 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.11.009 (2014).
Schröder, E. et al. Predicting children’s emerging Understanding of numbers. Dev. Sci. 25, e13207. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.13207 (2022).
Butterworth, B. Foundational numerical capacities and the origins of dyscalculia. Trends Cogn. Sci. 14, 534–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.007 (2010).
Libertus, M. E. et al. Understanding the mapping between numerical approximation and number words: evidence from Williams syndrome and typical development. Dev. Sci. 17, 905–919. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12154 (2014).
Carey, S., Shusterman, A., Haward, P. & Distefano, R. Do analog number representations underlie the meanings of young children’s verbal numerals? Cognition. 168, 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.022 (2017).
Condry, K. F. & Spelke, E. S. The development of Language and abstract concepts: the case of natural number. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 137, 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.137.1.22 (2008).
Le Corre, M. & Carey, S. One, two, three, four, nothing more: an investigation of the conceptual sources of the verbal counting principles. Cognition. 105, 395–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.10.005 (2007).
Libertus, M. E., Feigenson, L. & Halberda, J. Preschool acuity of the approximate number system correlates with school math ability. Dev. Sci. 14, 1292–1300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01080.x (2011).
Chu, F. W., vanMarle, K. & Geary, D. C. Predicting children’s reading and mathematics achievement from early quantitative knowledge and Domain-General cognitive abilities. Front. Psychol. 7, 775. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00775 (2016).
Geary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., Nugent, L. & Bailey, D. H. Adolescents’ functional numeracy is predicted by their school entry number system knowledge. PLoS ONE. 8, e54651. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054651 (2013).
van Marle, K. et al. Acuity of the approximate number system and preschoolers’ quantitative development. Dev. Sci. 17, 492–505. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12143 (2014).
Nieder, A. & Dehaene, S. Representation of number in the brain. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 32, 185–208. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135550 (2009).
McNeil, N. M., Fuhs, M. W., Keultjes, M. C. & Gibson, M. H. Influences of problem format and SES on preschoolers’ Understanding of approximate addition. Cogn. Dev. 26, 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2010.08.010 (2011).
Tikhomirova, T. et al. Development of approximate number sense across the elementary school years: a cross-cultural longitudinal study. Dev. Sci. 22, e12823. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12823 (2019).
Gilmore, C. K., McCarthy, S. E. & Spelke, E. S. Non-symbolic arithmetic abilities and mathematics achievement in the first year of formal schooling. Cognition. 115, 394–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.02.002 (2010).
Purpura, D. J. & Simms, V. Approximate number system development in preschool: what factors predict change? Cogn. Dev. 45, 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2017.11.001 (2018).
Slusser, E., Ribner, A. & Shusterman, A. Language counts: early Language mediates the relationship between parent education and children’s math ability. Dev. Sci. 22, e12773. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12773 (2019).
Winter, R. E., Stoeger, H. & Suggate, S. P. Fine motor skills and their link to receptive vocabulary, expressive vocabulary, and narrative Language skills. First Lang. 44, 244–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/01427237241233084 (2024).
Duncan, G. J. et al. School readiness and later achievement. Dev. Psychol. 43, 1428–1446. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1428 (2007).
Barner, D. Language, procedures, and the non-perceptual origin of number word meanings. J. Child. Lang. 44, 553–590. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000917000058 (2017).
Spelke, E. S. Core knowledge, language, and number. Lang. Learn. Dev. 13, 147–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2016.1263572 (2017).
Klibanoff, R. S., Levine, S. C., Huttenlocher, J., Vasilyeva, M. & Hedges, L. V. Preschool children’s mathematical knowledge: the effect of teacher math talk. Dev. Psychol. 42 (1), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.59 (2006).
Susperreguy, M. I. & Davis-Kean, P. E. Maternal math talk in the home and math skills in preschool children. Early Educ. Dev. 27, 841–857. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2016.1148480 (2016).
Pixner, S., Dresen, V. & Moeller, K. Differential development of children’s Understanding of the cardinality of small numbers and zero. Front. Psychol. 9, 1636. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01636 (2018).
Fernald, A., Marchman, V. A. & Weisleder, A. SES differences in Language processing skill and vocabulary are evident at 18 months. Dev. Sci. 16, 234–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12019 (2013).
Salminen, J. et al. Development of numeracy and literacy skills in early childhood: a longitudinal study on the roles of home environment and Familial risk for reading and math difficulties. Front. Educ. 6, 725337. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.725337 (2021).
Xiao, N. et al. Father-child literacy teaching activities as a unique predictor of Chinese preschool children’s word reading skills. Infant Child. Dev. 29, e2183. https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.2183 (2020).
Ma, Y., Fan, H. & Chen, Q. Socioeconomic status and vocabulary development among young children: a meta-analysis. Curr. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06666-2 (2024).
Schofield, T. J. et al. Intergenerational transmission of adaptive functioning: a test of the interactionist model of SES and human development. Child. Dev. 82, 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01539.x (2011).
Sohr-Preston, S. L. et al. Parental socioeconomic status, communication, and young children’s vocabulary development: a third-generation test of the family investment model. Child. Dev. 84, 1046–1062. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12023 (2013).
Vasilyeva, M. et al. Testing the family investment model in russia: estimating indirect effects of SES and parental beliefs on the literacy skills of first-graders. Early Child. Res. Q. 42, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2017.08.003 (2018).
Pace, A., Luo, R., Hirsh-Pasek, K. & Golinkoff, R. M. Identifying pathways between socioeconomic status and Language development. Annu. Rev. Linguist. 3, 285–308. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011516-034226 (2017).
Froiland, J. M., Powell, D. R., Diamond, K. E. & Son, S. H. C. Neighborhood socioeconomic well-being, home literacy, and early literacy skills of at-risk preschoolers. Psychol. Sch. 50, 755–769. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21711 (2013).
Abedi, J. & Lord, C. The Language factor in mathematics tests. Appl. Meas Educ. 14, 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324818AME1403_2 (2001).
Jordan, N. C., Huttenlocher, J. & Levine, S. C. Differential calculation abilities in young children from middle- and low-income families. Dev. Psychol. 28, 644–653. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.28.4.644 (1992).
Jordan, N. C., Huttenlocher, J. & Levine, S. C. Assessing early arithmetic abilities: effects of verbal and nonverbal response types on the calculation performance of middle- and low-income young children. Learn. Individ Differ. 6, 413–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/1041-6080(94)90003-5 (1994).
Jordan, N. C. et al. Number sense growth in kindergarten: a longitudinal investigation of young children at risk for mathematics difficulties. Child. Dev. 77, 153–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00862.x (2006).
Mix, K. S. Children’s equivalence judgments: crossmapping effects. Cogn. Dev. 23, 191–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2007.03.001 (2008).
Bao, Q. An Event-Related Potentials investigation of Mathematical Cognition of Children from Different Socioeconomic Status. Master’s Dissertation, Ningxia University (2014).
Ren, C. R. Measurement methodology on social economic status index of students. J. Educ. Stud. 5, 77–82. https://doi.org/10.14082/j.cnki.1673-1298.2010.05.010 (2010).
Marcovitch, S. et al. A longitudinal assessment of the relation between executive function and theory of Mind at 3, 4, and 5 years. Cogn. Dev. 33, 40–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2014.07.001 (2015).
Gathercole, S. E., Pickering, S. J., Ambridge, B. & Wearing, H. The structure of working memory from 4 to 15 years of age. Dev. Psychol. 40, 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.40.2.177 (2004).
Zelazo, P. D. The dimensional change card sort (DCCS): a method of assessing executive function in children. Nat. Protoc. 1, 297–301. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.46 (2006).
Peng, P., Yang, X. & Meng, X. The relation between approximate number system and early arithmetic: the mediation role of numerical knowledge. Journal Experimental Child. Psychology, 157, 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2016.12.011(2017).
Guo, X. et al. Validity and reliability of the Chinese and Kazakh versions of the Peabody picture vocabulary Test-Fourth edition in preschool children. Chin. Ment Health J. 33, 845–850. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2019.11.009 (2019).
O’Rear, C. D., Kirkland, P. K. & Purpura, D. J. The how many and give-n tasks: conceptually distinct measures of the cardinality principle. Early Child. Res. Q. 66, 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2023.08.010(2024).
Paliwal, V. & J Baroody, A. Cardinality principle understanding: the role of focusing on the subitizing ability. ZDM-Math Educ. 52, 649–661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01150-0 (2020).
Zhao, Z. G. The study on the development of number sense and estimation in young children aged 3–6. Master’s Dissertation, East China Normal University (2006).
Zhang, J. Y. Relationships between approximate number system accuracy and mathematical competence in young children aged 5–6. Master’s Dissertation, East China Normal University (2018).
Acar, I. H. Examining the regulatory and reactive temperamental characteristics as predictors of low income preschool children’s executive function. Curr. Psychol. 37, 748–759. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9562-3 (2018).
Dai, X. Y. A Study on Classroom Language Environment Supporting Early Childhood Children’s Vocabulary Development. Doctor’s Dissertation, East China Normal University (2023).
Hornburg, C. B., Schmitt, S. A. & Purpura, D. J. Relations between preschoolers’ mathematical Language Understanding and specific numeracy skills. J. Exp. Child. Psychol. 176, 84–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2018.07.005 (2018).
Reynolds, M. R., Hajovsky, D. B. & Caemmerer, J. M. The sexes do not differ in general intelligence, but they do in some specifics. Intelligence. 92, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2022.101651 (2022).
Sabbagh, M. A. et al. The development of executive functioning and theory of mind: a comparison of Chinese and U.S. Preschoolers. Psychol. Sci. 17, 74–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01667.x (2006).
Hayes, A. F. Introduction To Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach (Guilford Press, 2013).
Bronfenbrenner, U. & Morris, P. A. The bioecological model of human development. In Handbook of Child Psychology (eds Lerner, R. M. & Damon, W.) 793–828 (Wiley, 2006).
Dearing, E. & Taylor, B. A. Home improvements: Within-family associations between income and the quality of children’s home environments. J. Appl. Dev. Psychol. 28, 427–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2007.06.008 (2007).
Kaushal, N., Magnuson, K. & Waldfogel, J. How is family income related to investments in children’s learning? In Whither Opportunity? Rising Inequality, Schools, and Children’s Life Chances 187–205 (Russell Sage Foundation, 2011).
Carneiro, P. & Ginja, R. Partial insurance and investments in children. Macroecon Consum. 126, F66–F95. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12421 (2015).
Jiang, Y. & Wang, X. The relationship between family socioeconomic status and young children’s number sense development: the mediating role of parent-child activities. PLoS ONE. 19, e0301758. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301758 (2024).
Brito, N. H. & Noble, K. G. Socioeconomic status and structural brain development. Front. Neurosci. 8, 276. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2014.00276 (2014).
Rakesh, D. & Whittle, S. Socioeconomic status and the developing brain - a systematic review of neuroimaging findings in youth. Neurosci. Biobehav Rev. 130, 379–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.08.027 (2021).
Kirsh, D. & Maglio, P. On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action. Cogn. Sci. 18, 513–549. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1804_1 (1994).
Rashmita, S. M. et al. Socioeconomic status, parental investments, and the cognitive and behavioral outcomes of low-income children from immigrant and native households. Early Child. Res. Q. 23, 193–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2008.01.002(2008).
Evans, G. W. The environment of childhood poverty. Am. Psychol. 59, 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.2.77 (2004).
Evans, G. W., Gonnella, C., Marcynyszyn, L. A., Gentile, L. & Salpekar, N. The role of chaos in poverty and young children’s socioemotional adjustment. Psychol. Sci. 16, 560–565. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01575.x (2005).
Lawson, G. M., Hook, C. J. & Farah, M. J. A meta-analysis of the relationship between socioeconomic status and executive function performance among children. Dev. Sci. 21, e12529. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12529 (2018).
Blair, C. & Razza, R. P. Relating effortful control, executive function, and false belief Understanding to emerging math and literacy ability in kindergarten. Child. Dev. 78, 647–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01019.x (2007).
Clark, M. R. et al. The ecology of seamounts: structure, function, and human impacts. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 2, 253–278. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-120308-081109 (2010).
Huntley-Fenner, G. & Cannon, E. Preschoolers’ magnitude comparisons are mediated by a preverbal analog mechanism. Psychol. Sci. 11, 147–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00230 (2000).
Mussolin, C. et al. Relationships between approximate number system acuity and early symbolic number abilities. Trends Neurosci. Educ. 1, 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2012.09.003 (2012).
Wagner, J. B. & Johnson, S. C. An association between Understanding cardinality and analog magnitude representations in preschoolers. Cognition. 119, 10–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.11.014 (2011).
Rittle-Johnson, B., Fyfe, E. R., Hofer, K. G. & Farran, D. C. Early math trajectories: low-income children’s mathematics knowledge from ages 4 to 11. Child. Dev. 88, 1727–1742. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12662 (2017).
Butterworth, B. & Walsh, V. Neural basis of mathematical cognition. Curr. Biol. 21, R618–R621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.07.005 (2011).
Dehaene, S., Piazza, M., Pinel, P. & Cohen, L. Three parietal circuits for number processing. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 20, 487–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290244000239 (2003).
Holloway, I. D., Price, G. R. & Ansari, D. Common and segregated neural pathways for the processing of symbolic and nonsymbolic numerical magnitude: an fMRI study. NeuroImage. 49, 1006–1017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.07.071 (2010).
Sokolowski, H. M. et al. Common and distinct brain regions in both parietal and frontal cortex support symbolic and nonsymbolic number processing in humans: a functional neuroimaging meta-analysis. NeuroImage 146, 376–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.10.028 (2017).
Pica, P., Lemer, C., Izard, V. & Dehaene, S. Exact and approximate arithmetic in an Amazonian indigene group. Science 306, 499–503. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1102085 (2004).
Fuhs, M. W. & McNeil, N. M. ANS acuity and mathematics ability in preschoolers from low-income homes: contributions of inhibitory control. Dev. Sci. 16, 136–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12013 (2013).
Baldo, J. V. & Dronkers, N. F. Neural correlates of arithmetic and language comprehension: a common substrate? Neuropsychologia. 45, 229–235. (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.07.014
Arsalidou, M. & Taylor, M. J. Is 2 + 2 = 4? Meta-analyses of brain areas needed for numbers and calculations. NeuroImage. 54, 2382–2393. (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.009
Gordon, P. Numerical cognition without words: evidence from Amazonia. Science. 306, 496–499. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1094492 (2004).
Vygotsky, L. Thought and Language. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.1037/11193-000 (1962).
Carey, S. Bootstrapping & the origin of concepts. Daedalus. 133, 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1162/001152604772746701 (2004).
Burchinal, M., Vernon-Feagans, L. & Cox, M. Cumulative social risk, parenting, and infant development in rural Low-Income communities. Parenting. 8, 41–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295190701830672 (2008).
Hoff, E. How social contexts support and shape Language development. Dev. Rev. 26, 55–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2005.11.002 (2006).
Piaget, J. Psychology and Epistemology: Towards a Theory of Knowledge (Penguin Books, 1977).
Lindberg, S. M., Hyde, J. S., Petersen, J. L. & Linn, M. C. New trends in gender and mathematics performance: a meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 136, 1123–1135. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021276 (2010).
Acknowledgements
First, we would like to express our gratitude to the parents, children and kindergartens who participated in the survey and made this study possible. Second, we would also like to thank the teachers and students at Xinjiang Normal University for providing valuable feedback and support throughout the study.
Funding
This work was supported by the Xinjiang Normal University 2023 Young Top Talent Program [grant numbers XJNUQB2023-07]; the Youth Fund for Humanities and Social Sciences, Ministry of Education [grant number 22YJC880032]; the Family Education Research Project in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region in 2024 [grant number jtjy-dztj-2024165]; the Major Bidding Program for the “14 th Five-Year Plan” of Educational Science of Hebei Province [grant number 2201053]; and the Hebei Province Teaching Reform Program [grant number 2021XJJG007].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
H.L.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Funding acquisition, Writing- Original draft preparation, Writing – review & editing. B.D.: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Writing- Original draft preparation, Writing – review & editing. M.L.: Investigation, Writing- Original draft preparation, Writing – review & editing. M.C.: Validation, Writing – review & editing. E.X.: Supervision, Writing- Reviewing and Editing. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study was approved by the University Committee on Human Research Protection of Shanghai Normal University (No: 2023035). Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. Participants were informed about the purpose of the research, the methodology, and their rights, including the right to withdraw at any time without penalty.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Li, H., Duan, B., Luo, M. et al. Research on the mechanism of the influence of family socioeconomic status on the Cardinal principle of young children. Sci Rep 15, 19735 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-04693-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-04693-y




