Table 1 Literature Survey.
From: Study of thermal performance and melting behaviour of a novel paraffin wax-carbon quantum Dots PCMs
S No | Reference | Composite | wt/vol% | Thermal conductivity (k) | Latent heat/thermal performance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Hao and Gao62 | Paraffin/Alumina | 5 & 10 wt% | k enhancements: 2 & 6% | Latent heat decrease: 7% & 13% |
2 | Jesumathy, Udaykumar and Suresh63 | Paraffin/Copper oxide | 2, 5 & 10 wt% | k increased by 6, 6.7 & 7.8% in liquid state | Â |
3 | Ali et.al64 | Paraffin/ Al2O3, ZnO2Â and nano-SiC | 0.1, 0.5, 1,1.5 wt% | k increased by 3.3, 1.8 & 4.2% for 1wt% Al2O3, ZnO2Â and nano-SiC | Â |
4 | Wang et al.65 | Paraffin/ TiO2 | 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 0.9, 1, 3, 5 & 7 wt% | k increased with wt% | Latent heat increased at 0.7 wt% |
5 | Chaichan, Kamel and Al-Ajeely66 | Paraffin/ Alumina,TiO2 | 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5 wt% | k increased by 65% & 40% for alumina & TiO2 at 5 wt% | Â |
6 | Sahan, Fois and Paksoy67 | Paraffin/Fe3o4 | 20 wt% | k increased by 1.6% | Â |
7 | Nourani et al.68 | Paraffin/nano alumina | 2. 5, 5, 7.5 & 10 wt% | k enhancements: 31% (solid state) & 13% (liquid state) at 10 wt% | Melting rate increased by 27% |
8 | Colla et al.69 | RT20,RT25/Alumina, carbon Black | 1 wt% | k increased by 35% for CB with RT20 | Latent heat decreased by 12% for CB with RT25 Latent heat increased by 11% for alumina with RT20 |
9 | Shalaby et al.70 | Paraffin/ Alumina | 3 wt% | k enhancement: 18.6% | Â |
10 | Jesumathy71 | Paraffin/ Alumina | 5 & 10 vol% | k enhancement: 12.71% & 19.32% | Latent heat decrease: 0.74% & 1.64% |
11 | Gunjo et al.32 | Paraffin/Cu, CuO, & Al2O3 | 5 wt% | Â | Melting times decreased by 10, 3.5 and 2.25 times |
12 | Kumar et al.72 | Paraffin/Copper oxide | 0.5, 1, 1.5 & 2 wt% | k enhancements: 50, 95.5, 131.8 & 172.7% | Â |
13 | Kumar et al.73 | Paraffin/Zinc oxide | 0.5, 1 & 2 wt% | k enhancements: 41.6% for 2 wt% | Â |
14 | Goli et al.74 | Paraffin/Graphene | 1 & 20 wt% | k enhancements: 60% & 170% | Â |
15 | Liu et.al75 | Paraffin/Expanded graphite, MWCNT, graphite powder | 0.1, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2.5 wt% | k increased by 61.04, 51.2, 12.18, 10.22 for 2.5 wt% Expanded graphite, MWCNT, graphite powder | Â |
16 | Zhang et al.76 | Paraffin/Graphene | 3, 5, 7, 10 & 15 wt% | Â | Decrease in temp. rise by 8.77% with 15 wt% |
17 | Liu and Rao77 | paraffin/graphene, exfoliated graphite sheet | 2 wt% | k increased by 58.6% and 41.4% for 2 wt% graphene & graphite sheet | Â |
18 | Safaei, Goshayeshi, and Chaer78 | Paraffin/graphene oxide (GO) | 0.2, 0.4, and 0.6 wt% | Â | 25% increase in productivity |
19 | Kumar et al.79 | Paraffin/graphene (GR) | 0.5, 1, 1.5 & 2 wt% | k increased by 66.15% with 2 wt% | Â |
20 | Ali et al.80 | Paraffin/Nanographene | 1, 2 & 3 wt% | k enhancement: 146% at 3wt% | latent heat decrease: 3% at 3wt% |
21 | Li et al.81 | Paraffin/ EG,GR,GO | 0.5, 1, 1.5 & 2 wt% | k increased in the order GR, GO, and EG | Latent heat Decreased by 14.6% (EG), 18.6%Â (GO) and 19.4% (GR) at 1Â wt% |
22 | Janumala et al.60 | Paraffin/CQDs | 1, 5, 10,15 & 20 wt% | k increased by 10.04%, 19.21%, 38.43%,60.26% & 97.38% | Â |
23 | Emeema et al.61 | Paraffin/CQDs | 1, 5, 10, 15 & 20 wt% | Â | LH increased by 65.1%, 40.4%, 33.8%, 19.9% & 10.4% |