Table 3 A comparison between optimized solutions and best-performing mofs.

From: A multi-objective optimization-driven screening approach for maximizing hydrogen storage capacities in MOFs

Criteria

Density

(cm− 3)

GSA

(m2 g− 1)

VSA

(m2 cm− 3)

VF

PV

(cm3 g− 1)

LCD

(Å)

PLD

(Å)

Predicted UG

(wt%)

Predicted UV

(gH2L− 1)

Gravimetric capacity dominated solution

0.1

5573.97

557.39

0.90

9.09

19.41

17.27

21.27

34.63

MOF-12538*

0.107

5544.2

598.40

0.95

8.87

59.35

43.61

21.86

31.85

Feasible MOF identified by TOPSIS (Rank-1)

0.133

7200

958.55

0.90

6.82

17.75

14.54

17.95

35.7

MOF 2087*

0.132

7188.7

949.68

0.93

7.08

26.03

21.15

19.16

34.45

Volumetric capacity dominated Solution

0.247

7198.36

1778.78

0.89

3.63

18.03

10.94

12.18

37.94

Str_m3_o7_o19_f0_nbo.sym.22.out*

0.24

7174

1744

0.89

3.68

18

10.7

12.20

37.85

  1. * MOF from global database.
Back to article page