Table 4 Relationship between BMI and UA.
| Â | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β (95% CI) | P-value | β (95% CI) | P-value | β (95% CI) | P-value | |
BMI | 4.744 (3.795, 5.693) | < 0.001 | 4.711 (3.804, 5.618) | < 0.001 | 3.451 (2.494, 4.408) | < 0.001 |
Q1 | 0 (Ref.) | Â | 0 (Ref.) | Â | 0 (Ref.) | Â |
Q2 | 17.274 (7.368, 27.180) | < 0.001 | 14.670 (5.252, 24.089) | 0.002 | 8.125 (-1.227, 17.477) | 0.089 |
Q3 | 33.312 (23.456, 43.167) | < 0.001 | 31.610 (22.219, 41.001) | < 0.001 | 21.448 (11.853, 31.044) | < 0.001 |
Q4 | 48.144 (38.263, 58.025) | < 0.001 | 47.175 (37.716, 56.633) | < 0.001 | 34.558 (24.581, 44.534) | < 0.001 |
P for trend | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | |||