Table 2 MIMO/diversity antenna performance compared to the existing antennas with fractal-based radiators.

From: A common grounded ultra-wideband diversity/MIMO antenna with high inter-element isolation

References

Year

Type of Fractal

No. of Ports

Size

(λ0 × λ0)

Size/

Ports

(mm2)

Bandwidth

(GHz)

Isolation

(dB)

Isolation

Enhancement Technique

Peak Gain

(dB)

Efficiency

(%)

17

2022

Fractal circular ring radiator

4

1.139λ0 × 1.139λ0

2025

2.77−12

(124.98%)

>15

Self-decoupled

5

NM

18

2018

Self-similar

2

0.304λ0 × 0.405λ0

384

3.1−12.5

(120.51%)

>16

T-shaped stub with a vertical slot

4

NM

19

2023

Fractal-loaded circular radiator

2

0.912λ0 × 0.912λ0

2592

3.3−6

(58.064%)

>15

T-shaped stub

4.9

>95

20

2018

Koch

2

0.316λ0 × 0.507λ0

500

3.2−10.8

(108.57%)

>35

L-shaped stub

NM

NM

21

2019

Molecule-shape

4

0.507λ0 × 0.507λ0

400

2.4−10.6

(126.15%)

>20

Self-decoupled

NM

NM

22

2020

Modified Sierpinski carpet

2

0.304λ0 × 0.38λ0

360

3−13.5

(127.27%)

>16.3

Funnel-like stub with a vertical slot

4.8

NM

23

2023

Koch

4

1.139λ0 × 1.139λ0

2025

5.7−6.3

(10%)

>30

Metamaterial

NM

NM

24

2024

Circular ring

4

0.696λ0 × 0.696λ0

756.25

3.15−20

(145.57%)

>15

Self-decoupled

6.13

>85

This Work

---

Modified Koch

2

0.354λ0 × 0.734λ0

812

3.24−14.39

(126.48%)

>20

Meander line

6.1

>86

  1. 0 is the lowest resonance frequency; NM = Not mentioned