Table 7 Binding pockets and functional outcomes of Phytochemical-Protein Interactions.

From: Physiological and molecular responses of house fly (Musca domestica L.) to clove flower bud extracts

Target protein

Binding pocket characteristics

Eugenol

3-Allyl-6-methoxyphenol

Caryophyllene

Phenol, 2-methoxy-4-(2-propenyl)

3-Allyl-6-methoxyphenyl acetate

Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate

Cytochrome P450

Hydrophobic cleft with heme coordination

Blocks catalytic site (potential inhibitor)

Moderate inhibition

Strong hydrophobic interference

Competitive inhibition

Weak binding, minimal effect

Steric hindrance, substrate exclusion

Ecdysone 20-monooxygenase isoform X1

Steroid-binding hydrophobic pocket

Disrupts substrate binding

Partial inhibition

Strong allosteric modulation

Competitive inhibition

Weak binding, no effect

Competitive inhibition

Muscle calcium channel subunit alpha-1

Voltage-sensing domain (hydrophobic)

Weak allosteric modulation

Channel blocking

Strong allosteric inhibition

Stabilizes inactive state

Minimal modulation

Blocks ion conduction

Odorant binding protein 2

Aromatic/hydrophobic ligand-binding site

Competitive binding (odor masking)

Weak displacement of native ligands

Irreversible binding (odor suppression)

Competitive binding

No significant effect

Strong competitive binding

Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta

Extracellular ligand-binding domain

Weak antagonism

Minimal modulation

Allosteric inhibition

Weak binding

No effect

Weak antagonism

Vitellogenin domain-containing protein

Lipid-binding pocket

Disrupts protein-lipid interactions

Weak binding

Strong lipid displacement

Alters structural stability

No significant effect

Competes with endogenous lipids

Gustatory receptor

Bitter-taste receptor pocket (hydrophobic)

Taste modulation

Partial agonist

Strong antagonism (taste suppression)

Competitive binding

Weak interaction

Irreversible binding