Table 20 A comparison of this project with other CCUS projects in energy consumption and cost.
Project name | Region | Scale (104 t·a −1) | Comprehensive energy consumption (GJ·t−1) | CO₂ capture cost(CNY/t) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boudary Dam | Canada | 100 | 4.00 | >300 | Post-Combustion capture in coal-fired power plants |
Petro Nova | USA | 140 | 3.6 ~ 4.5 | >300 | CO2-EOR with storage |
Quest | Canada | 100 | 3.5 ~ 4.2 | >210 | Tail gas from hydrogen production unit |
Huaneng Shanghai Shidongkou Power Generation Co., Ltd | Shidongkou, Shanghai | 12 | 3.50 | / | Post-Combustion capture in coal-fired power plants |
Anhui Conch Cement Co., Ltd. Baimashan Cement Plant | Wuhu, Anhui | 5 | 3.40 | / | Cement kiln tail gas capture |
Guoneng Jinjie Power Plant 150,000 t/a Coal-Fired CO₂ Capture and Storage (CCUS) Demonstration Project | Yulin, Shaanxi | 15 | 2.90 | 180–250 | Post-Combustion capture in coal-fired power plants |
Jiangsu Huadian Jurong Power Generation Co., Ltd | Zhenjiang, Jiangsu | 1 | 3.20 | 350 | Post-Combustion capture in coal-fired power plants |
This project | Zibo, Shandong | 100 | 2.65 | 180 | low-temperature distillation |
