Table 9 Comparison of six formulas in different Averag TK and ΔTK subgroups.

From: Accuracy comparison of six intraocular lens formulas using total and standard keratometry measurements with the iolmaster 700

 

BU II-TK

SRK/T-TK

Haigis-TK

Hoffer Q-TK

Holladay 1-TK

Holladay 2-TK

Averag TK /Parameter

> 46 D, n = 32

 MAE

0.383 ± 0.296

0.466 ± 0.457

0.455 ± 0.401

0.499 ± 0.41

0.453 ± 0.333

0.472 ± 0.34

 SD

0.478

0.623

0.516

0.635

0.568

0.588

 MedAE

0.328#

0.389

0.350

0.460*

0.403

0.448

42–46 D, n = 158

 

 MAE

0.346 ± 0.345

0.4 ± 0.388

0.403 ± 0.375

0.446 ± 0.426

0.458 ± 0.433

0.415 ± 0.413

 SD

0.488

0.558

0.549

0.616

0.630

0.585

 MedAE

0.266a #

0.281

0.313

0.295

0.325*

0.280

< 42 D, n = 22

 MAE

0.375 ± 0.453

0.562 ± 0.549

0.402 ± 0.461

0.445 ± 0.496

0.58 ± 0.623

0.462 ± 0.512

 SD

0.588

0.671

0.613

0.669

0.788

0.648

 MedAE

0.224

0.369*

0.210#

0.325

0.318

0.225

 

BU II-TK

SRK/T-TK

Haigis-TK

Hoffer Q-TK

Holladay 1-TK

Holladay 2-TK

ΔTK/Parameter

> 1.0 D, n = 59

 MAE

0.366 ± 0.373

0.453 ± 0.401

0.41 ± 0.374

0.45 ± 0.408

0.482 ± 0.444

0.423 ± 0.401

 SD

0.518

0.601

0.549

0.601

0.648

0.578

 MedAE

0.284b

0.329

0.260#

0.313

0.385*

0.290

0.5 -1.0 D, n = 87

 MAE

0.361 ± 0.359

0.466 ± 0.475

0.417 ± 0.412

0.468 ± 0.473

0.501 ± 0.484

0.456 ± 0.45

 MedAE

0.522

0.683

0.594

0.675

0.707

0.652

 SD

0.254c d #

0.284

0.315

0.332

0.365*

0.330

< 0.5 D, n = 66

 MAE

0.335 ± 0.317

0.352 ± 0.343

0.403 ± 0.369

0.439 ± 0.393

0.419 ± 0.383

0.398 ± 0.373

 SD

0.444

0.461

0.538

0.578

0.548

0.529

 MedAE

0.266e #

0.266

0.330*

0.290

0.313

0.273

  1. #Represents the minimum value; *Represents the maximum value
  2. aBU II-TK < Haigis-TK, Hoffer Q-TK, Holladay 1-TK formulas (p < 0.01)
  3. bBU II-TK < Holladay 1-TK formulas (p < 0.05)
  4. cBU II-TK < Hoffer Q-TK, Holladay 2-TK formulas (p < 0.05)
  5. dBU II-TK < Holladay 1-TK formulas (p < 0.01)
  6. eBU II-TK < Hoffer Q-TK formulas (p < 0.05)