Table 4 Comparative study of ODHVCP-HOADL technique with existing methods20,21,36,37,38.
Method | \(\:\varvec{A}\varvec{c}\varvec{c}{\varvec{u}}_{\varvec{y}}\) | \(\:\varvec{P}\varvec{r}\varvec{e}{\varvec{c}}_{\varvec{n}}\) | \(\:\varvec{R}\varvec{e}\varvec{c}{\varvec{a}}_{\varvec{l}}\) | \(\:{\varvec{F}1}_{\varvec{M}\varvec{e}\varvec{a}\varvec{s}\varvec{u}\varvec{r}\varvec{e}}\) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
WKNN | 96.17 | 90.79 | 87.53 | 89.74 |
ANN Model | 97.14 | 93.50 | 77.16 | 85.96 |
VoteNet | 89.07 | 90.38 | 81.78 | 85.21 |
VoteNet + 3DRM | 95.62 | 94.80 | 81.01 | 88.21 |
MLCVNet | 95.37 | 92.65 | 80.36 | 88.52 |
YOLOv3 | 93.64 | 90.32 | 87.13 | 86.89 |
YOLOv4 + tiny | 91.18 | 91.40 | 87.92 | 88.73 |
YOLOv10 | 97.80 | 94.20 | 77.88 | 86.58 |
DCASR | 89.73 | 91.18 | 82.46 | 85.96 |
FSRCNN | 96.34 | 95.08 | 81.62 | 88.99 |
ODHVCP-HOADL | 99.64 | 95.71 | 88.31 | 90.98 |
