Table 7 Comparison between the proposed antenna and previously published antenna.

From: Regression machine learning-based highly efficient dual band MIMO antenna design for mm-Wave 5G application and gain prediction

References

Resonant Fr (GHz)

Operating range (GHz)

BW (GHz)

Substrate material

Board size

Port

Gain (dB)

Isolation (dB)

ECC DG (dB)

Efficiency (%)

RLC & machine learning

38

28, 38

27.6–28.6/37.4–38.6

1, 1.2

Rogers-5880

2.24λ0 × 2.1λ0

4

7.1, 7.9

> 27

< 0.001, NA

> 85

No/No

39

28, 38

NA

1.39, 3.33

Duroid 5880

3.87λ0 × 0.93λ0

4

5.59, 5.7

> 25

< 0.001/ > 9.96

> 84

No/No

40

28, 38

26.65–29.2, 36.95–39.05

2.55, 2.1

Duroid 5880

1.3λ0 × 2.42λ0

2

1.27, 1.83

> 20

< 0.001/ > 9.99

78, 76

No/No

41

28, 38

NA

1.06, 1.43

Rogers 5880

5.13λ0 × 10.2λ0

4

7.95, 8.27

> 26

< 0.001/NA

88.25

No/No

42

28, 38

NA

1.23, 1.06

Rogers Ro3003TM

0.7λ0 × 0.82λ0

2

6.6, 5.86

> 28

< 0.005/ < 9

80, 85

No/No

43

28, 38

26.6–29, 37.3–39.3

2.4, 2

Rogers RT5880

1.23λ0 × 1.23λ0

4

8.4, 6.02

> 25

0.005, ≈10

91.7, 88.6

No/No

44

28, 38

24–28, 37–40

4, 3

FR4

4.66λ0 × 4.66λ0

4

7.8, 4.4

> 20

0.01/9.99

65, 49

No/No

45

28, 38

24–28.8, 36.6–40.8

4.8, 4.2

RT5880

0.82λ0 × 1.6λ0

2

7.8, 6

> 30, > 28

0.0001, > 9.99

NA

No/No

46

28, 38

27.7–28.3, 37.7–38.3

0.6, 0.6

Rogers RO3003

2.43λ0 × 2.43λ0

4

7.37, 8.13

< 30, < 30

0.0005, 9.99

88, 88.6

No/No

47

28, 38

27.76–28.48, 37.69–38.19

0.72, 0.5

Rogers 3003

1.68λ0 × 0.79λ0

4

4.15, 7.73

> 20

< 0.03

80.13, 85.44

No/No

48

28

NA

0.658

Rogers RT5880

0.93λ0 × 0.93λ0

NA

7.63

NA

NA

89.66

No/Yes

49

27.75

27.5–28.35

0.85

RogersRT5880

1.85λ0 × 1.85λ0

2

10

> 19

0.002, 9.98

NA

No/Yes

50

28, 34

27.61–28.49, 33.61–34.27

0.88, 0.66

Duroid 5880

2.24λ0 × 0.93λ0

2

8.75, 5.5

> 30, > 23

0.0001, 9.99

98.5

No/Yes

Simulated

28, 38

26.73–29.28, 34.96–40.73

2.55, 5.77

Rogers RT5880

2.92λ0 × 2.92λ0

4

9, 8.4

> 35, > 29

< 0.001, > 9.99

> 98, > 99

Yes/Yes