Table 18 Comparative analysis of the relative significance.
Alternative | Proposed method (DEMATEL-CI with BCF environment) | IF DEMATEL52 | Fuzzy best–worst method using fuzzy DEMATEL53 |
|---|---|---|---|
\({\Pi }_{r}-{\Pi }_{c}\) | \({\Pi }_{r}-{\Pi }_{c}\) | \({\Pi }_{r}-{\Pi }_{c}\) | |
\({\boldsymbol{\Pi }}_{1}\) | \(0.2007\) | \(0.3511\) | \(0.1822\) |
\({\boldsymbol{\Pi }}_{2}\) | \(-0.2729\) | \(-0.2089\) | \(-0.4922\) |
\({\boldsymbol{\Pi }}_{3}\) | \(-0.2711\) | −0.1215 | \(-0.1518\) |
\({\boldsymbol{\Pi }}_{4}\) | \(0.0217\) | \(0.4057\) | \(0.2925\) |
\({\boldsymbol{\Pi }}_{5}\) | \(-0.1515\) | \(0.0953\) | \(-0.2869\) |
\({\boldsymbol{\Pi }}_{6}\) | \(0.4431\) | \(0.5561\) | \(0.3562\) |
Ranking of alternatives | \({\Pi }_{6}>{\Pi }_{1}>{\Pi }_{4}>{\Pi }_{5}>{\Pi }_{3}>{\Pi }_{2}\) | \({\Pi }_{6}>{\Pi }_{4}>{\Pi }_{1}>{\Pi }_{5}>{\Pi }_{3}>{\Pi }_{2}\) | \({\Pi }_{6}>{\Pi }_{4}>{\Pi }_{1}>{\Pi }_{3}>{\Pi }_{5}>{\Pi }_{2}\) |
