Table 2 Comparison of detection performance with mainstream and state-of-the-art algorithms.

From: Balancing complexity and accuracy for defect detection on filters with an improved RT-DETR

Model

Params(M)

FLOPs(G)

Precision/%

Recall/(%)

mAP@0.5(%)

mAP@0.5:0.95(%)

FPS

Faster R-CNN

42.0

180.0

90.70

90.21

90.02

65.84

31.0

SSD

21.1

62.7

85.54

82.59

82.30

56.58

120.2

YOLOv5m

21.2

49.0

86.08

88.48

88.26

64.33

166.7

YOLOv7-s AF

11.0

28.1

87.66

87.27

86.95

60.32

197.6

YOLOv8m

25.9

78.9

90.02

91.18

90.62

68.47

117.4

YOLOv9

25.3

92.87

92.15

91.18

92.40

68.07

74.9

YOLOv10

19.1

92.0

91.16

89.65

90.57

63.57

149.8

DETR

41.2

107.43

87.17

85.22

84.37

60.21

47.9

RT-DETR

20.1

58.29

83.20

90.54

90.32

65.37

134.1

RT-DETRv2

20.0

59.1

90.27

90.25

90.24

65.93

136.5

RT-DETR-LGA(ours)

18.7

50.67

98.54

97.07

97.67

75.72

118.1