Table 1 Comparison of TMR enamel subsurface lesion parameters before and after remineralisation in situ.

From: Efficient enamel subsurface lesion remineralisation and dentine tubule occlusion by high concentration CPP-ACP: a randomised, cross-over in situ study

Treatment #

LDd

(µm)

LDd-LDr

(µm)

ΔZd

(vol% min.µm)

ΔZd-ΔZr §

(vol% min.µm)

%R

CPP-ACP + SnF2

90.82 ± 12.36 a

20.44 ± 4.44 b

2155.2 ± 398.7 a

787.2 ± 145.2

36.61 ± 1.58

CPP-ACP

88.19 ± 1.95 a

14.09 ± 3.80 b

2002.3 ± 256.5 a

581.3 ± 97.6

28.82 ± 1.53

SnF2

82.22 ± 4.96 a

2.58 ± 2.88 a

1801.2 ± 110.2 a

161.9 ± 7.4

8.86 ± 0.71

Placebo

79.57 ± 2.62 a

-3.43 ± 3.50 a

1793.4 ± 175.0 a

42.3 ± 10.3

2.30 ± 0.43

  1. #Within a column, treatments sharing a letter are not significantly different at the 5% level (adjusted Sidak). Those values not labelled with a superscript letter are significantly different to all other values in the column.
  2. §ΔZd included in analysis of variance model as a covariate
Back to article page