Table 3 Comparative outcomes of IPOIAR-DPRNN methodology with existing methods18,19,25,26,27.
Methods | \(\:\varvec{A}\varvec{c}\varvec{c}{\varvec{u}}_{\varvec{y}}\) | \(\:\varvec{P}\varvec{r}\varvec{e}{\varvec{c}}_{\varvec{n}}\) | \(\:\varvec{R}\varvec{e}\varvec{c}{\varvec{a}}_{\varvec{l}}\) | \(\:{\varvec{F}}_{\varvec{m}\varvec{e}\varvec{a}\varvec{s}\varvec{u}\varvec{r}\varvec{e}}\) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Multi-part bag-of-poses | 82.15 | 81.05 | 78.50 | 80.22 |
RF-PCA | 89.67 | 82.71 | 81.84 | 76.02 |
HAR3DS-Lie Group | 90.88 | 80.46 | 84.53 | 79.43 |
LMMML-Skelets | 93.42 | 81.72 | 80.43 | 76.51 |
Lie group + CNN | 93.00 | 81.96 | 83.40 | 77.83 |
Skeletal BoW | 94.34 | 80.42 | 76.99 | 81.56 |
HDS-SP | 95.88 | 76.29 | 77.34 | 84.50 |
SJACHA-3DCNN | 96.76 | 85.26 | 80.88 | 83.01 |
YOLOv5 | 90.33 | 83.37 | 82.43 | 76.78 |
CNN | 91.64 | 81.02 | 85.13 | 80.05 |
ConvLSTM | 94.08 | 82.42 | 81.21 | 77.15 |
IPOIAR-DPRNN | 97.11 | 87.10 | 86.94 | 86.98 |
