Table 3 Comparison of accuracy of different methods.
From: Lubrication state identification of vibration time-frequency characteristics based on CWT and CNN
Method | Training set recognition rate | Test set recognition rate | GPU utilization |
|---|---|---|---|
CWT + CNN | 99.8% | 100% | 40% |
RMS + CNN | 65.2% | 63.8% | 41% |
PSD + CNN | 72.8% | 73.4% | 43% |
CWT + SVM | 78.5% | 76.3% | 12% |
