Table 6 Comparison of the Top-10 node rankings in the Jazz network across ten distinct approaches.
Rank | \({\varvec{BC}}\) | \({\varvec{CC}}\) | \({\varvec{CLC}}\) | \({\varvec{LGC}}\) | \({\varvec{ISC}}\) | \({\varvec{CLGC}}\) | \({\varvec{ECLGC}}\) | \({\varvec{EDDC}}\) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 67 | 67 | 25 | 67 | 70 | 158 | 7 | 67 |
2 | 31 | 7 | 29 | 7 | 35 | 152 | 67 | 7 |
3 | 7 | 23 | 77 | 20 | 115 | 170 | 20 | 23 |
4 | 70 | 90 | 99 | 23 | 175 | 172 | 23 | 20 |
5 | 23 | 93 | 144 | 90 | 163 | 144 | 18 | 90 |
6 | 32 | 20 | 158 | 18 | 1 | 171 | 13 | 93 |
7 | 47 | 74 | 185 | 13 | 2 | 173 | 19 | 13 |
8 | 30 | 101 | 186 | 93 | 3 | 188 | 15 | 18 |
9 | 62 | 125 | 188 | 109 | 4 | 185 | 101 | 74 |
10 | 93 | 109 | 196 | 74 | 5 | 186 | 14 | 109 |
