Table 2 ANOVA results of the model for MG dye degradation.
Source | Sum of squares | df | Mean square | F-value | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model | 390.97 | 14 | 27.93 | 72.36 | < 0.0001 | Significant |
A-H2O2 dosage | 32.99 | 1 | 32.99 | 85.49 | < 0.0001 | |
B-Catalyst dosage | 13.53 | 1 | 13.53 | 35.06 | < 0.0001 | |
C-Dye concentration | 1.54 | 1 | 1.54 | 3.99 | 0.0642 | |
D-Time | 98.66 | 1 | 98.66 | 255.63 | < 0.0001 | |
AB | 0.6006 | 1 | 0.6006 | 1.56 | 0.2313 | |
AC | 1.07 | 1 | 1.07 | 2.78 | 0.1165 | |
AD | 0.0182 | 1 | 0.0182 | 0.0472 | 0.8309 | |
BC | 0.1369 | 1 | 0.1369 | 0.3547 | 0.5603 | |
BD | 0.1936 | 1 | 0.1936 | 0.5016 | 0.4896 | |
CD | 0.2304 | 1 | 0.2304 | 0.5970 | 0.4517 | |
A2 | 122.79 | 1 | 122.79 | 318.16 | < 0.0001 | |
B2 | 88.83 | 1 | 88.83 | 230.16 | < 0.0001 | |
C2 | 48.40 | 1 | 48.40 | 125.40 | < 0.0001 | |
D2 | 79.93 | 1 | 79.93 | 207.10 | < 0.0001 | |
Residual | 5.79 | 15 | 0.3859 | |||
Lack of fit | 5.79 | 10 | 0.5789 | Insignificant | ||
Pure error | 0.0000 | 5 | 0.0000 | |||
Cor total | 396.76 | 29 | ||||
Std. Dev. | 0.6212 | R2 | 0.9854 | |||
Mean | 93.34 | Adjusted R2 | 0.9718 | |||
C.V. % | 0.6656 | Predicted R2 | 0.9160 | |||
Adeq precision | 26.0811 |