Table 4 Compressive Strength.
From: Evaluation of high performance concrete hardness properties using fuzzy logic based modeling
Model | Phase | R² | RMSE (MPa) | MAE (MPa) | VAF | A20 | OBJ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBFN | Train | 0.95 | 8.14 | 5.74 | 96.09 | 92 | 9.83 |
Validation | 0.94 | 12.91 | 10.51 | 92.55 | 85 | ||
Test | 0.95 | 14.59 | 12.20 | 91.65 | 80 | ||
LR | Train | 0.95 | 7.24 | 6.29 | 98.94 | 94 | 7.92 |
Validation | 0.94 | 7.23 | 6.64 | 99.54 | 94 | ||
Test | 0.94 | 7.49 | 6.44 | 98.73 | 93 | ||
GBM | Train | 0.98 | 2.81 | 2.30 | 99.23 | 99 | 3.31 |
Validation | 0.99 | 3.14 | 2.61 | 99.13 | 99 | ||
Test | 0.98 | 2.18 | 1.77 | 99.33 | 100 | ||
RF | Train | 0.99 | 3.63 | 2.21 | 99.54 | 99 | 1.50 |
Validation | 0.98 | 4.42 | 3.04 | 98.18 | 98 | ||
Test | 0.97 | 5.22 | 3.19 | 98.35 | 97 | ||
HFANN | Train | 0.98 | 1.66 | 1.36 | 98.45 | 100 | 2.92 |
Validation | 0.98 | 2.33 | 1.84 | 98.25 | 100 | ||
Test | 0.98 | 1.26 | 1.10 | 99.52 | 100 | ||
DGT | Train | 0.97 | 4.65 | 3.46 | 99.28 | 98 | 3.56 |
Validation | 0.97 | 3.52 | 3.03 | 99.09 | 99 | ||
Test | 0.98 | 3.23 | 2.31 | 99.89 | 99 | ||
CNN | Train | 0.96 | 7.37 | 6.20 | 98.42 | 94 | 8.05 |
Validation | 0.95 | 9.07 | 7.04 | 95.94 | 90 | ||
Test | 0.94 | 7.51 | 8.50 | 95.39 | 93 |
