Table 7 Comparison analysis with existing MCDM methods.
Evaluation Criteria | TOPSIS | VIKOR | EDAS | DEMATEL | MARCOS | MABAC | ELECTRE | Proposed IVSF-CoCoSo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Handling of Uncertainty | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium | High | High | High |
Support for IVSF Data | Low | Low | Low | Medium | Medium | High | Â | High |
Decision-Maker Diversity Accommodation | Medium | Medium | Medium | Low | Medium | Medium | High | High |
Sensitivity to Criteria Weights | High | High | Medium | Low | Medium | High | Medium | High |
Capability in Subjective Design Contexts | Low | Medium | Low | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium | High |
Computational Complexity | Medium | Medium | Medium | High | Medium | Medium | High | Medium |
Ranking Stability & Accuracy | Medium | High | Medium | Medium | High | High | Medium | High |
Flexibility in Real-World Creative Applications | Low | Medium | Low | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium | High |
