Table 4 Overall performance comparison across all application domains (Mean ± Standard Deviation). IKEDS demonstrates statistically significant superiority over all baseline approaches across all evaluation metrics, with effect sizes ranging from 1.78 to 2.92 indicating large practical significance.
Metric | IKEDS | KG-only | RAG-only | Parallel-KG-RAG | p-value | Effect size (d) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Decision accuracy (%) | 85.7 ± 3.2 | 74.6 ± 4.1 | 67.3 ± 4.8 | 77.6 ± 3.9 | < 0.001 | 2.34 |
Knowledge relevance | 0.91 ± 0.04 | 0.83 ± 0.05 | 0.74 ± 0.07 | 0.82 ± 0.06 | < 0.001 | 1.78 |
Explanation quality | 0.88 ± 0.05 | 0.75 ± 0.07 | 0.67 ± 0.08 | 0.76 ± 0.06 | < 0.001 | 1.86 |
Cross-domain integration | 0.84 ± 0.06 | 0.49 ± 0.09 | 0.47 ± 0.08 | 0.63 ± 0.07 | < 0.001 | 2.92 |
Learning efficiency | 0.79 ± 0.07 | 0.58 ± 0.08 | 0.61 ± 0.09 | 0.64 ± 0.08 | < 0.001 | 1.97 |