Table 2 Tube and rod process routings sorted in descending order with respect to the volume (the routings marked in bold are included in the simplified flowchart).
From: Cell formation in real manufacturing systems with complex flow and technological constraints
Routing (tube) | PRN | % accumulated volume | Routing (rod) | PRN | % accumulated volume |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ABEFGI | 27.9% | 1 | ABDEFHJKL | 30.5% |
5 | ADFLEMH | 52.5% | 5 | AF | 46.6% |
7 | ADEMG | 63.8% | 6 | AFGK | 54.4% |
6 | ADFLEMHO | 73.5% | 8 | AFMO | 61.8% |
9 | ADFLMO | 80.3% | 9 | ABDEFHJKLO | 69.2% |
4 | ADNFLEMG | 84.6% | 10 | AFLO | 75.5% |
2 | ACJKEDG | 88.9% | 13 | AFG | 79.1% |
3 | ABFLEG | 92.7% | 12 | AFK | 82.0% |
8 | ADFLM | 96.2% | 11 | FBOL | 84.8% |
11 | ADFLH | 98.1% | 2 | ACDEFHLNOJKP | 87.3% |
10 | ABFG | 99.6% | 7 | AFLO | 89.8% |
12 | ACPKERQBFHL | 100.0% | 16 | AFLN | 91.9% |
15 | AFM | 93.7% | |||
3 | ACDEFLNOIJKP | 95.5% | |||
14 | AQFGHJK | 96.8% | |||
4 | AFMOK | 97.8% | |||
17 | ABDEFHJKMO | 98.7% | |||
20 | ARFG | 99.2% | |||
18 | ACDEFHJKLNM | 99.6% | |||
19 | AEFHK | 100.0% | |||
