Table 14 Comparison between algorithms based on Ultra 85-P cell and TDM.
Algorithm | Best-obtained parameters | RMSE | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
\(I_{ph}\)(A) | \(I_{sd1}\)(A) | \(I_{sd2}\)(A) | \(I_{sd3}\)(A) | \(R_{s}(\Omega )\) | \(R_{p}(\Omega )\) | Non-ideality D1 | Non-ideality D2 | Non-ideality D3 | \(I_{sc}\)(A) | \(V_{oc}\)(V) | \(I_{mp}\)(A) | \(V_{mp}\)(A) | \(P_{mp}\)(W) | Best | Worst | SD | Fill Factor | Iphoto | |
ALO | 5.2324 | 0.0000030781 | 0.0000010829 | 0.0000050764 | 0.40968 | 123.5033 | 1.7607 | 1.604 | 1.5045 | 5.2144 | 22.1994 | 4.5785 | 15.1542 | 69.383 | 0.0035317 | 0.0464 | 0.0086512 | 0.59939 | 5.46807857906 |
SOA | 5.1775 | 0.0000097197 | 0.00001 | 0.0000070968 | 0.38799 | 17879.0286 | 1.6652 | 1.6458 | 1.9148 | 5.1767 | 22.1994 | 4.5986 | 15.0822 | 69.3567 | 0.018273 | 0.067436 | 0.013005 | 0.60352 | 5.450118271 |
STOA | 5.1775 | 0.000009882 | 0.0000099912 | 0.000000001091 | 0.40236 | 17852.2786 | 1.7721 | 1.5901 | 1.6271 | 5.1767 | 22.1994 | 4.6086 | 15.0858 | 69.525 | 0.02108 | 0.053492 | 0.011661 | 0.60499 | 5.450122833 |
RSO | 5.1775 | 0.000000001 | 0.000000001 | 0.0000017967 | 0.44281 | 119.3206 | 1 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 5.1577 | 22.1994 | 4.5749 | 15.2748 | 69.8811 | 0.040316 | 0.35231 | 0.073528 | 0.61032 | 5.470225581 |
YDSE | 5.182 | 0.0000090217 | 0.0000099996 | 0.0000067513 | 0.38613 | 290.6983 | 1.8767 | 1.9115 | 1.5404 | 5.1744 | 22.1994 | 4.5762 | 15.156 | 69.3567 | 0.011957 | 0.020243 | 0.0024403 | 0.6037900 | 5.457239148 |
m_YDSE | 5.2259 | 0.0000037599 | 0.00001 | 0.00001 | 0.40377 | 142.9689 | 1.4772 | 1.8936 | 1.9109 | 5.2106 | 22.1994 | 4.5754 | 15.1542 | 69.3359 | 0.0024296 | 0.0055027 | 0.00090419 | 0.59942 | 5.465391752 |
