Table 5 Comparison between algorithms based on RTC France cell and TDM.
Algorithm | Best-obtained parameters | RMSE | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
\(I_{ph}\)(A) | \(I_{sd1}\)(A) | \(I_{sd2}\)(A) | \(I_{sd3}\)(A) | \(R_{s}(\Omega )\) | \(R_{p}(\Omega )\) | Non-ideality D1 | Non-ideality D2 | Non-ideality D3 | \(I_{sc}\)(A) | \(V_{oc}\)(V) | \(I_{mp}\)(A) | \(V_{mp}\)(A) | \(P_{mp}\)(W) | Best | Worst | SD | Fill Factor | Iphoto | |
ALO | 0.76 | 0.00000011301 | 0.00000004885 | 0.0000053607 | 0.03336 | 478.4969 | 1.8339 | 1.3515 | 2 | 0.7599 | 0.5736 | 0.6876 | 0.4499 | 0.3094 | 0.0024381 | 0.0085795 | 0.0017563 | 0.70988 | 0.76055301715 |
SOA | 0.759 | 0.00000298140 | 0.000000001502 | 0.0000001102 | 0.03549 | 147.766 | 2 | 1.6841 | 1.4 | 0.7587 | 0.5736 | 0.689 | 0.4509 | 0.3107 | 0.0016526 | 0.008685 | 0.0020888 | 0.71392 | 0.760682638 |
STOA | 0.7601 | 0.0000059111 | 0.000000006288 | 0.00000000197 | 0.03774 | 492.8644 | 2 | 1.2 | 1.7429 | 0.7599 | 0.5736 | 0.6882 | 0.4508 | 0.3102 | 0.0020004 | 0.0086084 | 0.0024764 | 0.71166 | 0.760558235 |
RSO | 0.7225 | 0.000000001 | 0.000000001 | 0.000000076186 | 0.03501 | 23.8375 | 1.131 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 0.7214 | 0.5736 | 0.6519 | 0.4598 | 0.2998 | 0.031562 | 0.26133 | 0.067143 | 0.72445 | 0.761616819 |
YDSE | 0.7605 | 0.00000303190 | 0.0000035438 | 0.0000069898 | 0.04711 | 500 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0.7604 | 0.5736 | 0.6713 | 0.4321 | 0.2901 | 0.039208 | 0.10701 | 0.016283 | 0.66503 | 0.76057165461 |
m_YDSE | 0.7584 | 0.0000028477 | 0.00000000655 | 0.0000023804 | 0.03897 | 486.3567 | 1.9908 | 1.2 | 1.991 | 0.7583 | 0.5736 | 0.6877 | 0.4511 | 0.3102 | 0.0018409 | 0.0081304 | 0.001448 | 0.7605609 | 0.76056093162 |