Table 6 Comparison between algorithms based on Photowatt-PWP201 and SDM.
Algorithm | Best-obtained parameters | RMSE | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
\(I_{ph}\)(A) | \(I_{sd}\)(A) | \(R_{s}(\Omega )\) | \(R_{p}(\Omega )\) | Non-ideality | \(I_{sc}\)(A) | \(V_{oc}\)(V) | \(I_{mp}\)(A) | \(V_{mp}\)(A) | \(P_{mp}\)(W) | Best | Worst | SD | Fill Factor | Iphoto | |
ALO | 1.0318 | 0.000020737 | 0.9384 | 2730.5973 | 1.5736 | 1.0313 | 16.7783 | 0.9075 | 12.6101 | 11.4435 | 0.005891 | 0.10733 | 0.047434 | 0.66137 | 1.03205455659 |
SOA | 1.0286 | 0.0000025327 | 1.18374 | 974.1032 | 1.3176 | 1.0272 | 16.7783 | 0.9135 | 12.7084 | 11.609 | 0.0047963 | 0.09516 | 0.040677 | 0.67359 | 1.032953736 |
STOA | 1.031 | 0.0000080576 | 1.08484 | 3371.3807 | 1.4457 | 1.0305 | 16.7783 | 0.9151 | 12.6319 | 11.5594 | 0.0046288 | 0.095158 | 0.042769 | 0.66855 | 1.03203198 |
RSO | 0.9798 | 0.0000013707 | 1.55726 | 1549.7809 | 1.2567 | 0.9787 | 16.7783 | 0.8743 | 12.4996 | 10.9280 | 0.047137 | 0.21667 | 0.035113 | 0.6655 | 1.032736681 |
YDSE | 1.0282 | 0.0000052557 | 1.16636 | 1339.8783 | 1.3956 | 1.0271 | 16.7783 | 0.9104 | 12.625 | 11.4944 | 0.0048416 | 0.025521 | 0.0037334 | 0.66697 | 1.03259809255 |
m_YDSE | 1.0291 | 0.0000080074 | 1.09464 | 2208.4567 | 1.4463 | 1.0285 | 16.7783 | 0.9117 | 12.6335 | 11.5177 | 0.003344 | 0.0072051 | 0.00095625 | 0.66746 | 1.03221136908 |
