Table 9 Comparison between algorithms based on Kyocera KC200GT - 204.6 W and SDM.
Algorithm | Best-obtained parameters | RMSE | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
\(I_{ph}\)(A) | \(I_{sd}\)(A) | \(R_{s}(\Omega )\) | \(R_{p}(\Omega )\) | Non-ideality | \(I_{sc}\)(A) | \(V_{oc}\)(V) | \(I_{mp}\)(A) | \(V_{mp}\)(A) | \(P_{mp}\)(W) | Best | Worst | SD | Fill Factor | Iphoto | |
ALO | 8.078 | 0.000000001 | 0.2571 | 4633.776 | 1.0465 | 8.039 | 32.8998 | 7.5931 | 26.9703 | 204.7872 | 0.049784 | 0.47463 | 0.11362 | 0.7743 | 8.21045551655129 |
SOA | 8.4066 | 0.00000000236 | 0.21426 | 55.9126 | 1.0872 | 8.3345 | 32.8998 | 7.4405 | 27.0608 | 201.3448 | 0.083718 | 0.23791 | 0.033638 | 0.73429 | 8.2414606638 |
STOA | 8.4721 | 0.000000001022 | 0.24779 | 52.277 | 1.0479 | 8.3919 | 32.8998 | 7.4757 | 26.9546 | 201.5053 | 0.097551 | 0.23672 | 0.028192 | 0.72985 | 8.24891480968098 |
RSO | 7.389 | 0.000000001 | 0.18002 | 1425.6271 | 1.0554 | 7.3528 | 32.8998 | 6.9501 | 27.7131 | 192.6089 | 0.5393 | 2.7504 | 0.74923 | 0.7962 | 8.211036696 |
YDSE | 8.2392 | 0.000024716 | 0.03857 | 4778.8859 | 1.874 | 8.1998 | 32.8998 | 7.4566 | 26.5359 | 197.8669 | 0.14647 | 0.16577 | 0.0049979 | 0.73346 | 8.21006626026 |
m_YDSE | 8.0791 | 0.000000001 | 0.2564 | 2124.4256 | 1.0466 | 8.0396 | 32.8998 | 7.5877 | 26.9746 | 204.6749 | 0.048476 | 0.46415 | 0.088233 | 0.77382 | 8.2109908715 |
