Table 1 FGDM studies most related to this work and how their ideas inform the proposed FST framework.
Study | Setting/uncertainty type | Key methodological idea | Implication for FST (this paper) |
|---|---|---|---|
IJADS (2019): IT outsourcing under risks29 | Group MAGDM; risk and incomplete information | Risk-sensitive criteria weighting and structured handling of missing/partial inputs | Add a risk-awareness factor to criteria weights and explicit missing-data operators within the tensor |
JQEPO (2019): sustainable projects with incomplete info30 | Municipal project selection; incomplete evaluations | Hybrid aggregation that remains interpretable under information gaps | Use bounded imputation/interval fuzzification and report completeness diagnostics |
Scientia Iranica (2020): HF-COPRAS with last aggregation31 | Construction safety; hesitant-fuzzy sets | Last (late) aggregation to preserve expert individuality; HF-COPRAS ranking | Support hesitant inputs in FST and allow a late-fusion ranking stage over the aggregated tensor |
Industrial Management Studies (2017): HF-PSI for contractors32 | Contractor selection; hesitant-fuzzy sets | Preference Selection Index adapted to hesitant information and expert risk profiles | Offer HF-PSI as an optional scoring layer on top of FST’s aggregated representation |
Journal of Sustainable Mining (2025): dynamic IFGDM33 | Sustainability risk in mining; dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy | Time-aware entropy for criteria; similarity-based expert weights; dynamic ideal solution | Extend FST with a time mode and dynamic updates for criteria/expert weights |