Table 1 Characteristics of studies included into meta-analysis.

From: Association between the left-sided atrial septal pouch and the cryptogenic stroke – an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Study

Year

Country

Imaging method

Type of study

Preregistration

Interatrial septum related exclusion criteria

Cryptogenic stroke patients

Non-stroke patients (control)

All patients, n

Patients with LSSP, n

Patients without LSSP, n

Age, years, mean ± SD

Group characteristic

Cryptogenic stroke definition

All patients, n

Patients with LSSP, n

Patients without LSSP, n

Age, years, mean ± SD

Group characteristic

Tugcu et al.3

2010

USA

TEE

Case-control study

Local ethics committee

Presence of PFO, closed pouch, right-sided septal pouch and ASD

69

22

47

69.7 ± 8.4

Consecutive patients with first acute ischemic stroke

Modified TOAST criteria (modification not specified)

156

46

111

67.0 ± 8.4

NOMAS database patients: age, sex, and race/ethnicity matched

Wayangankar et al.21

2013

USA

TEE

No information

-*

Presence of PFO and ASD

66

9

57

-*

Consecutive patients undergoing TEE

Ischemic stroke with absence of atrial septal defect or shunt, atrial fibrillation, > 4 mm aortic arch plaque, and flow-limiting carotid disease (as determined by ultrasound or computed tomographic imaging)

500

51

449

-*

Consecutive patients undergoing TEE

Wong et al.16

2015

USA

TEE

Retrospective study

Local ethics committee

Presence of PFO and ASD

23

7

16

Mean: 57

Range:

16–90#

Consecutive patients undergoing TEE

Modified TOAST criteria: ischemic strokes with multiple competing identified etiologies were excluded from the cryptogenic category

106

15

91

Mean: 57

Range:

16–86#

Consecutive patients undergoing TEE

Yilmaz et al.22

2016

Turkey

CT

Case-control study

Local ethics committee

Presence of PFO, ASD and ASA

40

13

27

42.0 ± 6.7

18–55 years old patients with the acute stroke

Modified TOAST criteria: stroke of cause that was unknown despite extensive routine diagnostic examinations

40

10

30

42.5 ± 7.1

Sex-matched healthy controls

Strachinaru et al.24

2016

Belgium

TEE

Retrospective study

Local ethics committee

-*

45

7

38

55.0 ± 13.0

Consecutive patients admitted into the stroke unit undergoing TEE

The patients who had no definite source of cardioembolism, large artery atherosclerosis, or small artery disease despite extensive vascular, cardiac, and serologic evaluation

223

42

181

65.0 ± 15.0

Consecutive patients undergoing TEE

Sun et al.25

2016

China

TEE

Retrospective study

Local ethics committee

Presence of PFO and ASD

31

10

21

61.0 ± 12.0 (total population)

Consecutive patients undergoing TEE†

Ischemic stroke without definite source of thromboembolism

293

48

245

61.0 ± 12.0 (total population)

Consecutive patients undergoing TEE

Hołda et al.7

2018

Poland

TEE

Retrospective study

Local ethics committee

Presence of PFO, ASD and ASA

126

70

56

43.1 ± 11.1

Consecutive patients with first acute ischemic stroke

Modified TOAST criteria: cryptogenic stroke as an ischemic stroke in patients who had no definite source of cardioembolism, no large artery atherosclerosis, and no small-artery disease and for whom the cause of stroke was not defined despite extensive evaluation

137

56

81

45.3 ± 10.0

Consecutive patients, age and race/ethnicity matched

Kapoor et al.23

2021

USA

TEE

Retrospective study

Local ethics committee

Presence of PFO and ASD

67

29

38

58.2 ± 1.2

Consecutive patients undergoing TEE

Modified TOAST criteria: ischemic strokes with multiple competing identified etiologies were excluded from the cryptogenic category

144

41

103

55.9 ± 1.2

Consecutive patients undergoing TEE

  1. * information not provided by the authors in the publication.
  2. # Information regarding the standard deviation was not provided; only mean with age range was reported.
  3. † Information that all stroke patients were cryptogenic was obtained after contact with the first author.
  4. ASA, atrial septal aneurysms; ASD, atrial septal defect; CT, cardiac multidetector computed tomography; LSSP, left-sided septal pouch; NOMAS, Northern Manhattan Study; PFO, patent foramen ovale; TEE, transesophaegal echocardiography. n, number of patients.