Table 3 Evaluation of the suggested topology against other SCMLI topologies based on TSV, PIV for input DC voltage \({V}_{in}\), and cost function.

Reference	\({\text{N}}_{\text{L}}\)	TSV	PIV	\(\text{X}\)	\(\text{Y}\)	C.F
⁴	13	34V_in	6V_in	2.615	0.462	13.538
⁵	13	33V_in	5V_in	2.538	0.385	5.462
⁶	5	9V_in	V_in	1.800	0.200	7.400
⁷	9	11V_in	2V_in	1.222	0.222	4.667
⁸	9	11V_in	V_in	1.222	0.111	5.333
⁹	7	18V_in	3V_in	2.571	0.428	7.143
¹⁰	5	12V_in	2V_in	2.400	0.400	6.600
¹¹	7	16V_in	2V_in	2.285	0.285	9.143
¹²	5	8V_in	V_in	1.600	0.200	6.000
¹³	5	9V_in	V_in	1.800	0.200	7.400
¹⁴	5	11V_in	2V_in	2.200	0.400	6.200
¹⁵	5	20V_in	V_in	4.000	0.200	11.600
¹⁶	5	9V_in	V_in	1.800	0.200	7.000
¹⁷	9	10V_in	V_in	1.111	0.111	4.889
⁸	9	11V_in	V_in	1.222	0.111	5.333
¹⁸	9	10V_in	V_in	1.111	0.111	4.889
¹⁹	13	28V_in	3V_in	2.154	0.231	5.692
²⁰	13	33V_in	3V_in	2.538	0.231	5.923
²¹	9	10V_in	V_in	1.111	0.111	4.889
²²	13	32V_in	V_in	2.462	0.077	5.846
²³	13	33V_in	3V_in	2.538	0.231	5.923
²⁴	13	30V_in	3V_in	2.308	0.231	6.000
²⁵	5	12V_in	2V_in	2.400	0.400	7.800
²⁶	13	31V_in	5V_in	2.385	0.385	5.154
Proposed	13	17V_in	2V_in	1.307	0.153	4.538

Quick links

Search