Abstract
Periodontal diseases remain highly prevalent across age groups, often aggravated by poor oral hygiene, occlusal anomalies, and defective restorations. This study evaluated the effectiveness of Art-Dentale Expert mouthwash against major periodontopathogens in patients with mild chronic generalized periodontitis (CGP) using PCR diagnostics. Thirty-nine patients with CGP were randomized into a main group (Art-Dentale Expert) and a control group (Chlorhexidine). Gingival pocket samples were collected before treatment and at 7 days, 1 month, and 6 months. Four periodontopathogens (P. gingivalis, T. forsythia, T. denticola, and P. intermedia) were analyzed. The results obtained were processed statistically. Both rinses significantly reduced P. gingivalis and T. forsythia at 7 days, with Chlorhexidine showing a sharper initial decline in P. gingivalis. At 6 months, P. intermedia was completely absent in the Art-Dentale Expert group (p = 0.0209), whereas it persisted in 10% of controls. Art-Dentale Expert demonstrated sustained efficacy, particularly against T. denticola and P. intermedia. These findings support its role as an effective adjunct in periodontal therapy.
Introduction
Periodontitis is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects the supporting structures of the teeth and is a leading cause of tooth loss in adults worldwide. Beyond its oral impact, it has been associated with systemic conditions such as diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, and adverse pregnancy outcomes. The disease is initiated and sustained by a complex interaction between microbial biofilms and the host immune-inflammatory response1.
Epidemiological studies confirm a high prevalence of periodontal disease across all age groups, often linked to poor oral hygiene, dental anomalies, restorative complications, long-term medication use, and reduced immunity2,3,4,5. Microbiological studies have identified a wide variety of microorganisms in dental plaque, with pathogenicity strongly associated with gram-negative anaerobic species. In particular, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Tannerella forsythia, and Treponema denticola (“red complex”), as well as Prevotella intermedia and others from the “orange complex,” are considered the most virulent periodontopathogens6,7,8,9,10.
Accurate identification of these pathogens has become possible with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) diagnostics, which enables precise detection and monitoring of microbial shifts during therapy11. Traditional approaches to suppressing these pathogens include chemical antiseptics such as chlorhexidine, but their long-term use may be associated with adverse effects (tooth staining, altered taste, mucosal irritation). Consequently, there is increasing interest in herbal alternatives that combine antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and wound-healing properties12,13,14,15,16.
Despite these potential benefits, the evidence base for herbal mouth rinses in periodontitis remains limited, and few studies have directly compared them with standard agents17,18,19. To address this gap, we developed a novel herbal formulation, Art-Dentale Expert mouth rinse (Patent), containing extracts of eucalyptus leaves, thyme herb, and pomegranate pericarp in equal parts, combined with a water–propylene glycol blend and standard stabilizing agents20,21.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of Art-Dentale Expert mouth rinse on major periodontopathogens in patients with mild chronic generalized periodontitis (CGP), using PCR diagnostics.
Materials and methods
The ethics committee at the Medical Institute of Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia approved this study (Protocol 06 on 31.10.2019). This experimental study was performed to evaluate the “Art-Dentale Expert” mouth rinse in the treatment of chronic generalized periodontitis. The mouth rinse was manufactured by “KorolevPharm” LLC (Russia) and contains extracts of thyme herb, pomegranate pericarp, and eucalyptus leaves.
The study protocol was registered with thaiclinicaltrials.org on 04 May 2025 with the registration number: TCTR20250504001.
Study design and participants
This study included 40 patients (23 women and 17 men) aged 18 to 44 years (mean age 36.5 ± 7.02) with mild CGP (K 05.31). The sample size (n = 40; 20 per group) was determined a priori using power analysis to ensure adequate statistical sensitivity. Assuming a large effect size (Cohen’s d = 0.8), a significance level of 0.05, and power of 80%, a minimum of 40 participants was deemed sufficient. This number also aligned with clinical feasibility and available resources. One patient did not respond to follow-up, resulting in a final count of 39 patients (23 women and 16 men).
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (1975, revised in 2013), and was approved by the ethics committee of Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. It was performed at the dental clinics of Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia and the laboratories of Saint Petersburg State University. Informed consent was obtained from all patients.
Patients were assigned to two groups: a main group and a control group (Table 1).
The main group included 19 patients with mild CGP, whose treatment included local use of the “Art-Dentale Expert” mouth rinse. The control group consisted of 20 patients with mild CGP, whose treatment included the use of the 0.05% chlorhexidine bigluconate solution. All patients used the rinse twice daily for 1 min after brushing their teeth for 7 days.
Patients in both groups were comparable in age, gender, and concomitant somatic pathology. The diagnosis of periodontal diseases was carried out in accordance with the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10). All treatment measures were conducted based on medical indications.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria were a reliable diagnosis of mild CGP and informed voluntary consent from the patient. Exclusion criteria included the presence of bad habits (smoking); the presence of orthodontic appliances; severe concomitant pathology of internal organs with functional insufficiency; diabetes mellitus; malignant or benign neoplasms of any localization; HIV infection; active tuberculosis; and the patient’s refusal to be examined.
Clinical procedures
All patients underwent clinical and radiological examinations, which included collecting medical history, assessment of dental and oral health, and recording periodontal parameters before and after treatment, such as plaque index, gingival index, bleeding on probing, probing depth, and clinical attachment level. In terms of clinical manifestations of the disease, the patients were comparable.
Patients were treated according to a standardized regimen: patient education on oral hygiene, teeth cleaning according to the Baas technique, and optimal selection of care products, followed by subsequent control. To standardize individual oral hygiene, all patients were recommended to use Biorepair Total Protection toothpaste (Biorepair, Bologna, Italy), Biorepair CURVE Total Protection toothbrush (Protezione Totale), and interdental brushes.
After individual oral hygiene education, professional hygiene was conducted according to the Guided Biofilm Therapy (GBT) protocol. Scaling and root planing were performed, and as indicated, selective grinding of teeth, correction of overhanging edges of fillings, and polishing were performed. Subsequently, patients in the main group were prescribed the “Art-Dentale Expert” mouth rinse, while patients in the control group were prescribed the 0.05% chlorhexidine bigluconate solution for 7 days. Treatment was conducted by researcher (S.P.).
Microbiological assessment
PCR diagnostics were performed at the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “Saint Petersburg State University” after 7 days, 1 month, and 6 months.
On the day of sample collection, patients were instructed not to brush their teeth in the morning and to avoid using any medicated rinses. Microbiological samples were collected from the gingival pockets of patients in both groups using Absorbent Paper Points (Euronda, Italy) (size No. 25) sterile paper endodontic absorbents, which were inserted into the patient’s gingival pockets for 10–15 s. The obtained material was placed in a sterile, sealed Eppendorf tube and stored at −20 °C. The samples were obtained from the gingival pockets of the mandibular anterior group of teeth by one specialist (S.P.) following a standardized schema after 7 days, 1 month, and 6 months, with preliminary drying of the tooth surfaces in the morning on an empty stomach without prior brushing.
To isolate DNA from biological material, the Express-DNA-Bio kit (Alkor Bio, Russia) was used according to the protocol provided. Primers designed and tested in previous studies were utilized21. PCR was performed using the Tertsik amplifier (DNA-Technologies, Russia). The device was programmed for active temperature control in the solution: denaturation cycle at 94 °C for 15 s, primer annealing cycle at 94 °C for 15 s, DNA elongation cycle at 72 °C for 25 s. This cycle was repeated 35 times, followed by an incubation at 72 °C for 5 min.
DNA electrophoresis was conducted in a 1% agarose gel using a horizontal apparatus “WideMini-SubCell GT Cell-170–4468” (BioRad, USA) with Tris buffer (ThermoScientific, Germany). The electrophoresis lasted 40 min, and the voltage was set to 120 V with a gel area of 150 cm². To visualize DNA, ethidium bromide solution (0.5 µg/ml) was added to the gel. Visualization of the electrophoresis results was performed under ultraviolet light using the “iBright FL1500” (ThermoFisher, USA) visualization system. To calculate the molecular weights of the studied DNA fragments, the DNA marker “100 bp Plus DNA ladder” was utilized.
Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed using STATISTICA software. Nonparametric tests were applied due to sample size and distribution characteristics. Between-group comparisons were performed using the Mann–Whitney U test; within-group changes were analyzed with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. To account for multiple comparisons across time points, Bonferroni correction was applied (adjusted α = 0.017). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
Results
PCR diagnostics of the main periodontal pathogens in patients with mild CGP in the main and control groups before treatment showed a presence of all four studied microorganisms with the dominance of P. gingivalis (Table 2).
Dynamics of individual pathogens
P. gingivalis: Both rinses significantly reduced detection after 7 days, with a sharper decline in the control group (CHX). However, by 1 month, an increase was observed in both groups, followed by a substantial decrease at 6 months (− 61.1% in the main group, − 70.0% in the control). All changes from baseline were statistically significant (p < 0.05) (Fig. 1).
T. forsythia: In the main group, prevalence declined modestly and remained stable through 6 months (31.6%). In contrast, the control group showed complete elimination at 1 month, followed by a rebound to 40% at 6 months. Overall, both groups showed significant reductions compared with baseline (p < 0.05), with a more stable effect in the main group (Fig. 2).
T. denticola: The main group demonstrated a progressive decline, reaching complete elimination at 1 month (p = 0.0039) and remaining significantly reduced at 6 months (− 26.3% vs. baseline). By contrast, the control group showed an early increase at 7 days (p = 0.0003), partial reduction at 1 month, but relapse to baseline prevalence at 6 months (Fig. 3).
P. intermedia: The control group exhibited a transient increase at 7 days (20% → 50%, p = 0.02) before returning to baseline at 1 month. In the main group, prevalence remained low and by 6 months P. intermedia was completely absent (p = 0.0209), whereas 10% of control patients still tested positive (Fig. 4).
Thus, the results of PCR diagnostics demonstrate the positive effect of “Art-Dentale Expert” mouth rinse in relation to specific periodontopathogens T. denticola and P. intermedia, which is expressed in a more intensive elimination of pathogens from the gingival pockets of patients compared to patients in the control group. The dynamics of detection of periodontopathogen complexes in the gingival pockets of patients in the main and control groups after the treatment is shown in Table 3.
When assessing the effectiveness of the proposed therapy, attention was paid to reducing the complexes of periodontopathogens, especially their absence and detection of a single periodontopathogen. A Single periodontopathogen was found in gingival pockets and in patients without inflammatory symptoms of periodontal tissues. The proposed treatment has led to a sharper, statistically significant (p < 0.05), decrease in the number of periodontopathogens in the main group after 7 days: up to 21% of cases of single periodontopathogens and up to 42% complete elimination of periodontopathogens, compared to the control group (10% of single periodontopathogens and 30% absence of periodontopathogens). This result indicates an obvious effect of using “Art-Dentale Expert” mouth rinse during complex treatment. One month after treatment, a further decrease in the number of periodontopathogens was noted in patients of the main group (Table 3). After six months, one, two and three periodontal pathogens were detected in both groups, while the periodontal pathogens were not detected in the range of 50% in both groups.
Discussion
Herbal mouth rinses are quite effective for continuous oral care, akin to non-herbal mouth rinses based on chlorhexidine, which remains the “gold standard” in the treatment and prevention of oral diseases23. However, products containing chlorhexidine in various concentrations are not recommended for continuous use due to undesirable side effects, such as tooth staining and taste changes23. In contrast, natural ingredient-based products can be used for extended periods in daily oral care. The active ingredients in herbal products can penetrate biofilms and prevent plaque accumulation, thereby minimizing bacterial colonization on tooth surfaces24. They exhibit antimicrobial efficacy against dental caries and periodontal pathogens while reducing the development of resistance to medicinal products due to their synergistic combinations25. Additionally, herbal extracts can inhibit osteoclast differentiation and the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines24, thereby suppressing bone resorption in periodontitis. Herbal mouthwashes may also decrease the adhesion of microbes to sutures following periodontal surgery, potentially improving healing26.
The present study demonstrated that Art-Dentale Expert, a mouth rinse containing eucalyptus, thyme, and pomegranate extracts, significantly reduced the detection of key periodontopathogens, with sustained suppression of T. denticola and complete elimination of P. intermedia at six months. These findings support the potential of herbal rinses as effective adjuncts in periodontal therapy. The antimicrobial activity of Art-Dentale Expert likely arises from the synergistic action of its components. Eucalyptus contains eucalyptol and flavonoids with antibacterial and anti-inflammatory properties, reducing bacterial adhesion and inhibiting cytokine release. Thyme provides thymol, which disrupts microbial membranes and biofilms, enhancing plaque control. Pomegranate is rich in polyphenols and tannins, which interfere with bacterial enzymes, reduce oxidative stress, and promote gingival healing. Together, these extracts can penetrate biofilms, reduce microbial colonization, and suppress host inflammatory responses, thereby creating conditions conducive to periodontal stability [20-22].
Numerous studies have investigated herbal oral products for their potential to reduce plaque accumulation and gingival inflammation, collectively demonstrating benefits in both clinical and microbiological outcomes. Suchetha and Bharwani evaluated Periocare® Gum Massage Powder27, Vajrabhaya et al. assessed a herbal toothpaste containing Aloe vera28, and Ardakani et al. tested a herbal mouthwash formulated from Myrtus communis, Quercus brantii, Punica granatum, Portulaca oleracea, and Boswellia serrata29, with all reporting improvements in periodontal health. Our findings are consistent with the review by Khan et al. (2023), which concluded that herbal agents may serve as effective alternatives to conventional therapy due to their favorable safety profiles and reduced risk of drug resistance30. Comparisons of herbal mouth rinses with chlorhexidine against facultative anaerobes such as Enterobacter cloacae, Actinomyces viscosus, and Eikenella corrodens31, as well as against Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sanguinis, and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans32, indicated superior antibacterial activity for chlorhexidine, findings that differ from our results—likely due to differences in the pathogens studied. Nevertheless, our outcomes parallel those of Saquib et al. (2019), who demonstrated significant antibacterial effects of Salvadora persica (Miswak) and Cinnamomum zeylanicum (Ceylon cinnamon) extracts against P. gingivalis, T. denticola, and T. forsythia when combined with antibiotics33. Similarly, Karygianni et al. (2016) highlighted the antimicrobial effectiveness of various plant-derived products, including Vitis vinifera, Pinus species, Coffea canephora, Camellia sinensis, Vaccinium macrocarpon, Galla chinensis, and Caesalpinia ferrea Martius, in the treatment of dental diseases18, further reinforcing the role of natural agents in periodontal care.
Beyond herbal products, emerging biologically based adjuncts further support the shift away from exclusive reliance on chlorhexidine. For example, Butera et al. (2023) demonstrated the value of probiotic protocols in reducing periodontal inflammation34, and Cosola et al. (2022) showed improved peri-implant mucositis outcomes with hypochlorite-based formulations35. Together, these studies highlight a growing movement toward innovative, patient-friendly interventions, with herbal rinses representing one promising approach within this wider therapeutic landscape.
In summary, the data suggest that even six months after treatment, the use of “Art-Dentale Expert” mouth rinse resulted in superior improvements in periodontal tissue health compared to the control group. This conclusion is supported by two observations: first, there was a comparable improvement in the microbiological state of the gingival pockets for both groups; second, the primary group exhibited a reduction in the number of periodontopathogens in complexes (from four to three), a dynamic that was not observed in the control group. Thus, we conclude that “Art-Dentale Expert” mouth rinse has a statistically significant positive effect, providing prolonged benefits as a maintenance therapy during comprehensive treatment of mild chronic gingivitis.
This study provides valuable insights but should be interpreted considering its strengths and limitations. Strengths include the use of PCR diagnostics for precise identification of key periodontopathogens, a longitudinal design with multiple follow-up points (7 days, 1 month, and 6 months), and standardized clinical protocols for periodontal therapy and home care, which helped reduce confounding variables. However, the relatively small sample size limits the generalizability of the findings, and patient compliance with mouth rinse use at home was not objectively monitored. In addition, the absence of randomization may have introduced allocation bias, and only four pathogens were assessed, leaving other members of the subgingival microbiome unexamined. Future randomized controlled trials with larger populations, broader microbial profiling, and longer follow-up periods are needed to confirm and extend these results.
Clinical relevance
For clinicians, the findings suggest that Art-Dentale Expert may be considered as a maintenance rinse during comprehensive periodontal therapy, particularly for patients requiring long-term plaque control but wishing to avoid chlorhexidine’s side effects. Its sustained suppression of T. denticola and P. intermedia is clinically meaningful, as these pathogens are strongly associated with disease progression. Integration of such herbal rinses into daily oral hygiene routines may enhance patient compliance and provide lasting antimicrobial protection.
Conclusions
The use of the “Art-Dentale Expert” mouth rinse in the complex treatment of mild CGP has a positive effect on T. denticola and P. intermedia, leading to an accelerated decrease in the frequency of detection of periodontopathogens in the gingival pockets of patients compared to the control group and to a more significant decrease in the number of periodontopathogens studied in complexes in patients of the main group with mild CGP after just 7 days compared to the control group.
Patent
Patent No. 2,762,978 C1 Russian Federation, IPC A01G 7/00, A01G 22/60. Method for spectral identification of the herb Mansoa alliacea (Lam.): No. 2,021,115,728: declared 01.06.2021: published 24.12.2021/A. A. Elapov, A. I. Marakhova, V. Yu. Zhilkina [et al.]; applicant Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education “Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia”. – EDN DVKFBV.
Data availability
The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
López-Valverde, N., Quispe-López, N. & Blanco Rueda, J. A. Inflammation and immune response in the development of periodontal disease: a narrative review. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 14, 1493818 (2024).
Carvajal, P. et al. Prevalence of periodontal diseases: Latin America and the Caribbean consensus 2024. Braz Oral Res. 38 (suppl 1), e116 (2024).
Robert, B. et al. Multimorbidity patterns and periodontal diseases in a French Hospital-Based dental school: A retrospective Cross-Sectional study. J. Clin. Med. 13 (22), 6631 (2024).
Mayta-Mayorga, M., Guerra-Rodríguez, V. & Bernabe-Ortiz, A. Association between type 2 diabetes and periodontitis: a population-based study in the North Peru. Wellcome Open. Res. 9, 562 (2024).
Ghasemi, S. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the association of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio with periodontitis. Eur. J. Med. Res. 29 (1), 581 (2024).
Marsh, P. D. Dental plaque as a biofilm and a microbial community - implications for health and disease. BMC Oral Health. 6 (Suppl 1(Suppl 1), S14 (2006).
Marsh, P. D. Microbiology of dental plaque biofilms and their role in oral health and caries. Dent. Clin. North. Am. 54 (3), 441–454 (2010).
Bernimoulin, J. P. Recent concepts in plaque formation. J. Clin. Periodontol. 30 (Suppl 5), 7–9 (2003).
BelibasakisGN et al. Periodontal microbiology and microbial etiology of periodontal diseases: historical concepts and contemporary perspectives. Periodontol 2000. 00, 1–17 (2023).
Maoyang, L., Songyu, X. & Zhao, W. Oral microbiota: A new view of body health. Food Sci. Hum. Wellness. 8 (1), 8–15 (2019).
Maheaswari, R., Kshirsagar, J. T. & Lavanya, N. Polymerase chain reaction: A molecular diagnostic tool in periodontology. J. Indian Soc. Periodontol. 20 (2), 128–135. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.176391 (2016 Mar-Apr).
Gorbatova, E. A., Lemetskaya, T. I. & Manuilov, B. M. Domestic preparations from plant materials in the complex treatment of periodontal diseases. Inst. Stomatology. 1, 32–33 (2000). (in Russ.).
Cruz Martínez, C., Diaz Gómez, M. & Oh, M. S. Use of traditional herbal medicine as an alternative in dental treatment in Mexican dentistry: a review. Pharm. Biol. 55 (1), 1992–1998 (2017).
Amanpour, S. et al. A systematic review of medicinal plants and herbal products’ effectiveness in oral health and dental cure with health promotion approach. J. Educ. Health Promot. 12, 306 (2023).
Carrol, D. H. et al. Antibacterial activity of plant species used for oral health against Porphyromonas gingivalis. PLoS One. 15 (10), e0239316 (2020).
Zhang, J. et al. The safety of herbal medicine: from prejudice to evidence. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat Med. 2015, 316706 (2015).
Rezaei-Tazangi, F. et al. Herbal and nano-based herbal medicine: new insights into their therapeutic aspects against periodontitis. Avicenna J. Phytomed. 2024,14 (4), 430–454.
Karygianni, L. et al. Natural antimicrobials and oral microorganisms: A systematic review on herbal interventions for the eradication of multispecies oral biofilms. Front. Microbiol. 6, 1529 (2016).
Eid Abdelmagyd, H. A., Ram Shetty, D. S. & Musa Musleh Al-Ahmari, D. M. Herbal medicine as adjunct in periodontal therapies- A review of clinical trials in past decade. J. Oral Biol. Craniofac. Res. 9 (3), 212–217 (2019).
Marakhova, A. I. et al. Development of a complex herbal remedy for the prevention of inflammatory diseases of the oral cavity. Bashkortostan Med. J. 17 (5), 62–66 (2022). (In Russ.).
Panov, S. N. et al. Clinical assessment of the periodontal tissues during complex treatment of patients with chronic generalized periodontitis using herbal rinse. Russian J. Dentistry. 27 (5), 431–441 (2023).
Mikhaylova, E. S., Lashchenov, P. V. & Koroleva, I. V. Clinical and Microbiological assessment of periodontal tissues in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Int. J. Pharm. Res. 11 (4), 831–840 (2019).
Poppolo Deus, F. & Ouanounou, A. Chlorhexidine in dentistry: Pharmacology, Uses, and adverse effects. Int. Dent. J. 72 (3), 269–277 (2022).
Mehta, V. et al. Effectiveness of herbal oral care products in reducing dental plaque and gingivitis: an overview of systematic reviews. Can. J. Dent. Hyg. 58 (2), 120–134 (2024).
Goncharova, E. I. The use of the herbal medicinal products for the prevention and treatment of periodontal diseases. Russian Dent. J. 3, 48–50 (2012).
Garg, J. et al. Antimicrobial activity of chlorhexidine and herbal mouthwash against the adherence of microorganism to sutures after periodontal surgery: A clinical Microbiological study. Cureus 14 (12), e32907 (2022).
Suchetha, A. & Bharwani, A. G. Efficacy of a commercially available multi-herbal formulation in periodontal therapy. J. Indian Soc. Periodontol. 17 (2), 193–197 (2013).
Vajrabhaya, L. O. et al. Efficacy of a herbal toothpaste during active periodontal treatment: A clinical study. Dent. J. (Basel). 12 (12), 378 (2024).
Talebi Ardakani, M. et al. Effect of an herbal mouthwash on periodontal indices in patients with plaque-induced gingivitis: A cross-over clinical trial. J. Adv. Periodontol Implant Dent. 14 (2), 109–113 (2022).
Khan, S. F. et al. Licorice as a herbal extract in periodontal therapy. Drug Target. Insights. 17, 70–77 (2023).
Yaghooti Khorasani, M. M. et al. Comparative evaluation of a commercial herbal extract and 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthwash on three periodontal facultative anaerobes: an in vitro study. Int. J. Dent. 2022, 6359841 (2022).
Pathan, M. M., Bhat, K. G. & Joshi, V. M. Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of a herbal mouthwash and chlorhexidine mouthwash on select periodontal pathogens: an in vitro and ex vivo study. J. Indian Soc. Periodontol. 21 (4), 270–275 (2017).
Saquib, S. A. et al. Evaluation and comparison of antibacterial efficacy of herbal extracts in combination with antibiotics on periodontal pathobionts: an in vitro Microbiological study. Antibiot. (Basel). 8 (3), 89 (2019).
Butera, A. et al. Evaluation of the efficacy of probiotics domiciliary protocols for the management of periodontal Disease, in adjunction of Non-Surgical periodontal therapy (NSPT): A systematic literature review. Appl. Sci. 13, 663. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13010663 (2023).
2 et al. The effectiveness of the information-motivation model and domestic brushing with a hypochlorite-based formula on peri-implant mucositis: A randomized clinical study. Clin. Exp. Dent. Res. 8 (1), 350–358. https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.487 (2022).
Acknowledgements
The authors declare no acknowledgments. This paper has been supported by the RUDN University Strategic Academic Leadership Program.
Funding
No funds were received for this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, S.R. and E.M.; methodology, A.B., S.P and A.M; software, A.M. and I.K; validation, S.R. and H.B; formal analysis, H.B and S.P.; investigation, S.P. and A.M.; resources, A.B. and H.B.; data curation, I.K and E.M.; writing—original draft preparation, H.B. and S.P.; writing—review and editing, S.R. and A.B.; visualization, E.M.; supervision, S.R.; project administration, S.R and A.M. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study was reviewed and approved by the research ethics committee at the medical institute, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia under protocol number 6 at 31.10.2019. A written informed consent for the patients was obtained to participate in this study.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Razumova, S., Panov, S., Marakhova, A. et al. Of the article: Microbiological assessment of a herbal mouth rinse for treating chronic generalized periodontitis. Sci Rep 15, 38216 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-22028-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-22028-9



