Table 4 Summary of clarke’s error grid analysis (CEGA) performance for different model types.
Model | TCH study data | Ohio T1DM | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Zone: A + B (TP & TN) | Zone: C (FP) | Zone: D + E (FN) | Zone: A + B (TP & TN) | Zone: C (FP) | Zone: D + E (FN) | |
Central | 99.36\(\:\pm\:\)13.22 | 0.13\(\:\pm\:\)0.14 | 0.51 \(\:\pm\:\)0.32 | 99.56\(\:\pm\:\)8.25 | 0.06\(\:\pm\:\)0.05 | 0.38\(\:\pm\:\)0.19 |
Local | 98.51\(\:\pm\:\)19.12 | 0.31\(\:\pm\:\)0.33 | 1.18\(\:\pm\:\)0.77 | 99.19\(\:\pm\:\)11.09 | 0.10\(\:\pm\:\)0.06 | 0.72\(\:\pm\:\)0.25 |
Federated (FedGlu) | 99.12\(\:\pm\:\)16.15 | 0.15\(\:\pm\:\)0.15 | 0.74\(\:\pm\:\)0.40 | 99.42\(\:\pm\:\)7.34 | 0.08\(\:\pm\:\)0.06 | 0.50 \(\:\pm\:\)0.32 |
