Table 4 Ablation Study on Component Contributions of TYolo for Seismic Fault Interpretation.

From: An end-to-end fault interpretation method driven by visual foundation model with domain adaptation fine-tuning

Model configuration

MAE (%)

(Mean ± Std)

RMSE (%)

(Mean ± Std)

ΔMAE vs. TYolo

Original Yolo (No components)

12.37 ± 0.87

14.68 ± 1.03

 + 155.9%

 + Data Augmentation (DA)

8.92 ± 0.62

10.85 ± 0.76

 + 84.7%

 + Uncertainty-Guided Annotation (UGA)

7.15 ± 0.50

8.70 ± 0.61

 + 48.0%

 + Physical-embedded Tuning (PET)

5.41 ± 0.38

6.58 ± 0.46

 + 12.0%

Full TYolo (Proposed)

4.83 ± 0.34

6.25 ± 0.44

–

Back to article page