Table 2 Results of the proposed approach for BC classification alongside the different ablation studies.
From: Embedding-driven dual-branch approach for accurate breast tumor cellularity classification
Approach | Accuracy (%) | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Precision (%) | F1 (%) | Average (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal (full model) | \(97.86 \pm 0.0013\) | \(97.86 \pm 0.0013\) | \(99.29 \pm 0.00043\) | \(97.86 \pm 0.00131\) | \(97.86 \pm 0.0013\) | 98.15 |
|  | [97.85–97.87] | [97.85–97.87] | [99.29–99.30] | [97.85–97.87] | [97.85–97.87] |  |
No data augmentation | \(89.37 \pm 0.00523\) | \(89.37 \pm 0.00523\) | \(96.46 \pm 0.00174\) | \(89.37 \pm 0.00531\) | \(89.37 \pm 0.00531\) | 90.79 |
|  | [89.36–89.38] | [89.36–89.38] | [96.45–96.47] | [89.36–89.38] | [89.36–89.38] |  |
No embedding branch | \(25.00 \pm 0\) | \(25.00 \pm 0\) | \(75.00 \pm 0\) | N/A | N/A | 41.67 |
|  | [25.00–25.00] | [25.00–25.00] | [75.00–75.00] | – | – |  |
No vision branch | \(95.75 \pm 0.00248\) | \(95.75 \pm 0.00248\) | \(98.58 \pm 0.00083\) | \(95.79 \pm 0.00249\) | \(95.77 \pm 0.00248\) | 96.33 |
|  | [95.74–95.76] | [95.74–95.76] | [98.57–98.59] | [95.78–95.80] | [95.76–95.78] |  |
