Table 2 The comparison between mucosal and submucosal cancer.

From: Location characteristics of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

 

Mucosal cancer (n = 105)

Submucosal cancer (n = 58)

p value

Age, median (range) years

67 (41 ~ 85)

66 (48 ~ 82)

0.806

Male, n (%)

88 (83.8)

53 (91.4)

0.183

Location, n (%)

 Upper thoracic

6 (5.7)

10 (17.2)

0.024

 Mid thoracic

63 (60.0)

41 (70.7)

0.176

 Lower thoracic

36 (34.3)

7 (12.1)

0.003

Macroscopic type, n (%)

 I

2 (1.9)

11 (19.0)

0.002

 IIa

8 (7.6)

21 (36.2)

< 0.001

 IIb

93 (88.6)

12 (20.7)

< 0.001

 IIc

2 (1.9)

7 (12.1)

0.017

 III

0 (0)

7 (12.1)

0.020

EUS accuracy, n (%)

80 (76.2)

39 (67.2)

0.220

Whole or near circumferential, n (%)

5 (4.8)

9 (15.5)

0.026

Treatment, n (%)

 Surgery

45 (42.9)

44 (75.9)

< 0.001

 Endoscopic resection

60 (57.1)

14 (24.1)

 

Differentiation, n (%)

 Well

62 (59.0)

11 (19.0)

< 0.001

 Moderate

40 (38.1)

31 (53.4)

0.060

 Poorly

3 (2.9)

16 (27.6)

< 0.001

Tumor length, median (range) cm

1.5 (0.1 ~ 8.3)

2.7 (0.6 ~ 10.0)

< 0.001

Lympho-vascular invasion, n (%)

2 (1.9)

6 (10.3)

0.033

Lymph node metastasis, n (%)

2 (1.9)

7 (12.1)

0.017

  1. *EUS, endoscopic ultrasound.